Palestinian Independence – BDS Movement Against Israeli Apartheid
April 23, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Palestinian freedom struggle since the establishment of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948 has been through trials and tribulations with peace talks and negotiations especially by United States serving Israel’s exclusive interests prolonged suffering and facilitated territorial conquest diminishing prospects for two states solution – the aggressors’ precise agenda.
Israel’s hardliners and conservative religious factions in the United States sharing self-prophesized conviction in anticipation of fantasy fulfillment exacerbated Palestinian plight with militarization of meager territory.
Israeli colonization following 1967 invasion of Palestinian land including Golan Heights in Syria and persecution thereafter has been limited to worldwide reaction,
However. not subjected to similar actions against invariably non-western nations for any violation of the so-called international law.
Iraq – when the former President Saddam Hussein submitted to globalists decoy and invaded Kuwait in 1990 – U.S. led military intervention again with mass deception (WMD) claiming Iraqi babies were thrown out of incubators in the Hospital and,
Kuwait Ambassador to the United States – the daughter posing as mainstream victim was coached to perform to Congress for U.S. taxpayer funding of the war.
Subsequently the U.S. administrations successively imposed economic sanctions on Iraq despite Iraq withdrawal from Kuwait.
Other scenarios comprising U.S. trade embargo against nations condemned for various activities deemed illegal and criminal by U.S. and allies not surprisingly located in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Middle East leaving the west sacrosanct considering the role played thus far as the architects of chaos, carnage and destruction across the globe.
North Korea – indefinite sanctions with no serious engagement in constructive dialogue although the late Premier Kim Jong IL requested direct dealings with United States stating voluntary nuclear disarmament in 2010 and 2011 – only to be ignored by the United States.
India and Pakistan – Sanctions under former President Bill Clinton for conducting nuclear tests – a privilege granted only to nuclear states such as USA, Israel, UK and France… either having used nuclear weapons or continue to use them in the form of depleted uranium witnessed in Iraq and white Phosphorous bombing in Gaza in 2009.
Both USA and Israel refused to sign non-NPT (Nuclear Proliferation Treaty) – the argument India and Pakistan maintains in non-cooperation concerning NPT.
Post Vietnam War – the stringent measures against then rivals crippled economies in that region.
Latin America – any nation unwilling to surrender to United States unreasonable terms and conditions are targeted with coup d’état.
Africa – Global corporations governing the continent for natural resource exploitation control the political system.
However, South Africa – the apartheid regime was brought down with sanctions and international pressure initially resisted by United States and western powers viz. United Kingdom, Australia and Canada.
Contemporarily Iran and Syria face the wrath of imperialistic discretion.
Middle East – Iran is struck with SWIFT termination – depriving the Islamic Republic financial services network to process trade payments in vilification for alleged nuclear program.
With the exception of South Africa due to global dissent on racial discrimination – the western nations are by and large absolved from crimes against humanity in spite of being responsible for the status quo.
Palestinian effort in the dismal failure of partisan peace treaty overwhelmingly favoring Israel with the exception of Oslo accord – the agreement conveniently discarded by Israel has contributed to the civil society creation of BDS.
BDS – Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions that began in 2005 is under tremendous assault arguably for the effectiveness on the oppressor and agents paving the path to deplorable conditions adversely affecting millions of lives forcing youth population to succumb to undesirable options – committing suicide or becoming potential terror recruit in the beleaguered Palestinian state.
Fortunately, the latter alternative has been lately abandoned to a large extent with commitment to non-violence protests through BDS pursued in ending the occupation for Palestinian liberation.
As for credibility with boycott adaptation – not long ago non-violence (Ahimsa) pioneer – Mahatma Gandhi boycotted goods restricting profitability for colonial power to eliminate atrocity and eventually enabled India to challenge colonialism.
To summarize BDS impact on Palestinian cause – Israeli authorities disproportionate investments in discrediting BDS with a portfolio assigned for this purpose alongside media propaganda evidently rocking the boat demanding compliance to legitimate peace plan outlined on numerous occasions earlier.
Israel might be the presumed economic and military power with the superpower United States at beckon call –
The inevitable change leading to the beginning of the conclusion of hegemonic era could no longer be evaded by orthodox or unconventional means conforming to the reality –
The rise and fall of mighty empires is testimony to mankind rejection of natural law.
BDS – upon being organized diligently promoting awareness dedicated to Palestinian independence in solidarity would deliver the imminent outcome.
Good Luck! To the peaceful and non-violent campaign for free Palestine.
Israeli moderate thinkers and peace activists pledging support to BDS set precedence in modern revolution for universal liberty, equality and justice.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://youtu.be/y1gGValAMlY http://youtu.be/x4SsgTiqr_A http://youtu.be/O_DfokMGZQA http://youtu.be/CHmizpcUB0g http://youtu.be/5gL37pO2KVI http://youtu.be/7P5IDfj_Vm8UN Vote on Palestinian Statehood
April 21, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Arab Spring continues to draw world attention especially UNSC vigorous role against selective nations at United States and allies behest,
While decades old freedom struggle in Israeli occupied Palestinian territories regarded irrelevant even though casualties in Gaza, West Bank and East Jerusalem alone exceed Arab Spring states combined together in the last decade.
The political uprising in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain, Libya and Syria are outbursts from prolonged suppression whereas Palestinian suffering is endurance to classic colonization rule.
Palestinian right to exist and self-determination vehemently denied by occupier Israel somehow not considered an urgent issue by the international organization responsible for the status quo in the establishment of Israel alongside neglecting Palestinian homeland entitlement.
Had UN concurrently declared Palestinian statehood on May 14, 1948 many lives could have been saved on both sides,
Besides preventing controversial and provocative Jewish settlements in West Bank and East Jerusalem carried out in defiance of international denouncement.
UN as an international body maintaining non-discriminatory practice towards all would clarify credibility in settling disputes without being used a political tool at the victims’ plight.
Meanwhile Israeli check posts in West Bank and barrier wall in East Jerusalem rendering natives life impossible constitutes oppression.
Furthermore illegal administrative detention of Palestinians in hundreds held in Israel’s custody without charge or trial are few of many atrocities committed against Palestinian population by the state of Israel.
The recent UNHCR vote on settlements expansion with overwhelming majority demanding encroachment termination is ignored without consequences such as sanctions and standard measures that otherwise imposed on United States adversaries in the region.
United States veto until now favoring Israeli government aggression confirms hypocrisy in humanitarian matter largely attributed to Israel subjugation of the so-called superpower diminished to compliance to Israeli interests and quest for global dominance.
Palestinian statehood could no longer be differed or rejected with veto threats from the United States and allies in the forefront preaching democracy, human rights and political independence – the package deal offered to preferred nations contrarily declined to Palestinians pleading for statehood recognition over half a century.
United Nations purpose would be meaningful and credible upon expediting similar decision on Israel in 1948 i.e.
Palestinian sovereignty and comprehensive removal of Israeli presence from Palestinian territories based on pre 1967 borders conforming to international acknowledgment.
South Africa would not be free without worldwide condemnation of apartheid exemplified in necessary actions like trade embargo and isolation by international community.
With Palestine – dialogue and peaceful negotiations through quartet and U.S. initiatives inherently biased to ally Israel has facilitated territorial conquest via unlawful residential allotments to Jewish settlers proliferating beyond reason.
Alternatively stalling peace talks with unreasonable demands and pre-conditions insisting on no stipulations contradictory to assertions by Israel.
Carte blanche to Israeli military attacks on Gaza regardless of civilian deaths with experimental missiles testing Iron Dome (anti-rocket / missile-defense system) effectiveness in the preparation to pre-emptive strike against Iran.
Israel never subjected to IAEA or UN inspection on nuclear status despite being the only nuclear state with military invasion history across Middle East.
Unfortunately, Israel – the holocaust survivor has evolved into genocide contributor with footprints in contemporary violence involving innocent civilians across the border and around the world.
Israel could refrain from self-detrimental activities and reverse the trend beginning with Palestinian cause, cooperation in the international nuclear disarmament, demonstrating patience in Iran – EU nuclear discourse, abstention in Syrian political crisis…among numerous life threatening events.
It is time for United Nations to move forward without prejudice on Palestinian statehood accompanied by full UN membership invitation to the people of Palestine and prove the global representatives commitment to universal liberty and justice.
UN procrastination under domineering powers pressure would invalidate identity as the international group of sovereign nations pledged to global peace and emancipation.
Free and sovereign Palestine would promote solidarity and mutually beneficial trade relations with Israel as well as other neighbors in the region.
Wishing Palestinian citizens – independent Palestine with peace and prosperity in abundance and,
To Israel – peaceful co-existence and eternal progress in serving humanity at large.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://youtu.be/HvMGE1rYBz4 http://youtu.be/L32Nama7ad8 http://youtu.be/vJrvnM9Thx4 http://youtu.be/idjXz4OqBMg http://youtu.be/f-QHsM3sBIg http://youtu.be/o2TfJdW7HSo http://youtu.be/G9MCB0w4cIs http://youtu.be/7FEkhT0tq8k http://youtu.be/CUO5kKolc3EU.S. and Allies War and Peace Quagmire – Global Dominance Part II
April 20, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Afghanistan – The key strategic location has been invaded by prominent powers with occupiers goals defeated despite military might and unparalleled technology against native fighters in the largely mountainous terrain.
Following 9/11 – the U.S. and NATO invasion of Afghanistan initially premised on war against Al Qaeda – the CIA brainchild to drive former Soviet army from Afghan soil along with then mujahedeen trained and armed by United States that are Taliban forces today seeking closure to foreign occupation after a decade old warfare seemingly fighting the loosing battle.
Another bone of contention is Intrusion in domestic affairs specifically puppet regime installation reporting to Washington and NATO through agreement for permanent base subsequent to the so-called troop withdrawal in 2014.
It is clear that the supposed war on terror for over ten years in Afghanistan having claimed many innocent lives and armed forces on all sides with controversial drone attacks until now in both Islamic nations – Afghanistan and Pakistan justifiably causing furor amongst local residents mostly tribal and rural population surviving at western air power mercy.
The prolonged war in Afghanistan waged against Taliban and fragmented militancy groups has exacerbated Afghans plight.
Notwithstanding U.S. army personnel morale reflected in the series of incidents ranging from Holy Quran burning, desecration of deceased Afghan fighters, U.S. army sergeant shooting spree killing unarmed women, children and men to the latest U.S. military personnel pictures posing with Afghan suicide bombers mutilated body parts…are disturbing signs indicative of troops war fatigue rebelling against protracted military presence having lost purpose and credibility in the misguided mission.
Afghanistan deprived of progress due to continuous foreign intervention is also burdened with systemic corruption,
Western funneled poppy production arming the insurgents and warlords,
Western backed government inefficiency in every aspect attributed to political instability, economic disparity other than civilization frozen in time on social issues such as women’s rights in particular.
A month ago, much to Afghan government’s frustration United States and NATO declared truce with Taliban reportedly head quartered in Qatar. The short-lived situation was no surprise with both sides defaulting to carnage and destruction.
Upon reviewing Afghan history since 1970’s, mujahedeen evolved into Taliban never engaged in threatening United States and allies national security unlike radicalized networks courtesy Saudi Arabia targeting vulnerable tribal and disenfranchised segments in Pakistan, Yemen and lately behind sectarian violence in Iraq with trail leading to Libya and Syria.
However, then CIA manufactured militancy alias Al Qaeda initially to fight against Soviets has been a convenient tool until date in pursuing global military action to benefit the military industrial complex and globalists agenda – access to natural resources by force under war on terror pretext and long term strategic gains in the designated regions asserting prowess against those perceived competitors in economic and military power.
Reiterating earlier statement – 9/11 direct links with Israel and Saudi Arabia shared interest for regime change to strike Iraq eliminating former President Saddam Hussein completely ignored launching military attacks in Afghanistan rendering the Central Asian hub and neighboring state Pakistan – fertile ground in testing and exhausting weaponry to boost defense and crude oil stocks,
Besides facilitating widespread violence and terror recruitments in both nations to perpetuate war policy that was never credible from the onset.
Similar actions perpetrated against citizens of Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain, Syria and Iran to destabilize volatile Middle East to secure indefinite troop deployment and naval fleet obstructing hope for democracy with western leaderships delegated as sales executives to promote arms purchase for defense industry.
Any environment riddled with constant shelling and decimation denying victims glimpse of optimism to emerge and rebuild lives provides immunity to chaos and criminality subjugating demography to internal and external influence.
Afghanistan devoid of foreign military interference and instead assistance towards economic development laying a strong foundation on education with schools across the country, health care facilities and modern infrastructure utilizing labor within society would not only occupy youth with positive productivity but also prevent terror recruitment.
As for training Afghan security personnel to prepare them in national defense – considering imperialism lack of success in Afghanistan evidently Afghan fighters are better equipped and qualified to organize national army.
With corrupt free competent administration succeeding incumbency, disciplined military institution and defense academy could be a no brainer for any nation.
The new government priority in maintaining law and order is largely dependent upon commitment to public safety and unified approach with opposition to commission diligent law enforcement agency.
According to U.S. and NATO public statements on Afghanistan readiness post U.S. withdrawal – the past few years spent in imparting skills to protect civilians and safeguard national territory.
Yet the events in 2012 with U.S. armed forces and Afghan soldier offensive engagement resulting in civilian and army casualties contradictory to U.S. and NATO position on ground reality alongside drone assaults in Northwestern Pakistan extended over to Afghan border confirm otherwise.
In the absence of military accountability including disproportionate Pentagon budget exempt from external audit, the extravagant spending with no checks and balances on wars and military bases deserve thorough review and fund reallocation to vital domestic programs and job creation in the United States.
Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai announcement to step down in 2013 a year ahead of scheduled troop pull out would mean transitional government to govern until early or full term election.
The interim governance headed by leadership with popular votes in 2009 election would guarantee stable governance per people choice.
Complete overhaul of political system and judiciary in democratic setting to curb corruption is paramount to move the nation forward.
Taliban impact on national security could perhaps ease upon offering gainful employment to misled recruits while disarming various factions operating in and around the borders.
Tribal areas urged to lay down their arms with trusting and respected Patriarch conveying the message in different parts of the country would restore peace.
Further addressing grievances in Tribal, rural and urban settlements with result oriented actions would win hearts and minds of the people.
Terminating poppy cultivation and replacement with agriculture especially staple diet could generate self-sufficiency in addition to government land provisions for organic produces allowing farmers to contribute to national exports and GDP.
Mutually beneficial trade investments in Afghanistan by international community substituting foreign military confinement could bring desirable changes in the economy.
Afghanistan neighbors concern over prevalent deteriorating conditions could be alleviated with peaceful transformation from killing to saving lives in unanimous call to expedite end to aggression on all sides consisting arms embargo and restricting ammunition supply responsible for the status quo.
Regional partners surrounding Afghanistan could play an important role through cooperation rather than competition in the establishment of pervasive peace and stability.
Afghanistan could no longer be subjected to bloodshed, drug trafficking, arms trade and above all globalists appointed government exploiting national wealth for self-interest at the vast majority misery.
In conclusion, United States, NATO and coalition comprehensive troop removal, not barring paramilitary, espionage agents, private contractors as mercenaries from Afghan domain is pertinent for Afghanistan sovereignty creating an opportunity to desperately required advancement under republic rule.
U.S, and NATO procrastination would clarify real motives not necessarily in Afghanistan or their favor given the precipitous decline in U.S. troop conduct having reached the breaking point demanding exit from the war zone prior to potential untowardness directed at authority.
Choosing honorable departure prudent than delayed debacle.
Wishing people in Afghanistan a new beginning on the horizon with long lasting peace and prosperity.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Syria – UN Backed Military Monitors and Troop Deployment
April 14, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Since Syrian fragile ceasefire in the last forty-eight hours, the UN plan to deploy 30 unarmed military observers and according to reports UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan’s spokesman Ahmad Fawzi press statement confirmed –
“UN backed mission would have about 200-250 observers and that nations were being asked to contribute soldiers.”
Furthermore UNSC chamber closed door briefing and UN emissary Kofi Annan assessment of Syrian situation in Syria’s UN ambassador Bashar Ja’afari’s absence poses credibility factor considering,
The exclusive sessions lacking in transparency – characteristic of global powers prerogative in display disregarding negative impact on concerned member nations portends peace disruption rather than establishment.
The globalists’ news agencies disclaimer citing unverifiable and unconfirmed reports as well as images alluding to post ceasefire violence eruption and military armored vehicle in cities and towns adds to the intentional confusion amid peace process.
Despite rational requests from other UNSC members to curtail demonstrations allowing peace to prevail,
The western allies Arab League coerced protest asserting to test Syrian authority tolerance with the report claiming three protesters were killed and several injured on Friday, April 13, 2012 – suggestive of external forces vehement opposition to their own so-called peace treaty.
Given the trajectory peace is antithetical to war mongering nations pledged to death and destruction promoting defense industry and crude oil stocks at innocent lives expense tragically underestimating the backlash in accordance with natural law –
What goes around comes around.
Syrian government persistence in maintaining ceasefire including troops and military weapons withdrawal is necessary to resume humanitarian relief alongside peace talks with citizens in Syria.
Perhaps the people in Syria could reject foreign fighters false representation and nations exploiting Syrian political uprising for strategic gains against Iran.
UN current undertaking to send military monitors albeit unarmed combined with troop deployment is not a peace mission instead indicative of foreign invasion under disingenuous pretext,
Not to mention the UN peacekeeping forces track record in civil wars in Africa – DPR (The Democratic Republic of Congo) in particular.
Apparently war is the preferred choice and all efforts are poised at provocation than revocation conforming to selective self-detrimental agenda.
UN involvement in Syria would be legitimate upon refraining from aimed attacks and rhetoric against one side while choosing to remain oblivious to other side that is funding, arming and fueling the conflict.
Syria, Iran or any other Islamic and non-Islamic nations could no longer be experimental battlegrounds to military industrial complex engaged in testing innovative artillery and exhausting ammunition inventory for replenishment.
The political leaderships promoting arms sales to boost domestic dire economy neglecting life saving over mass killings exacerbate their population and war victims plight in the much-touted globalization with intertwined economic activities having ripple effects when inflicting pain and suffering against one nation for others short term advantage.
Syria is a litmus test for United States and allies to exemplify sincere commitment to peace and political stability in the war fatigued Middle East with citizens desperately seeking end to foreign intervention via military aggression and economic sanctions – the two potent arsenals at UNSC disposal to subjugate nations regarded adversaries for vested interests.
Both options hurt the population than the intended target.
Meanwhile, Syrian authorities are urged not to provide any opportunity to local or foreign agents in derailing peace and political dialogue with civil society.
Syrian government responsibility extended beyond national security in protecting civilians from any harm would alleviate tensions and address skepticisms on leaderships’ role in prioritizing public safety amongst impartial minds at UNSC and international community at large.
UN peace mission devoid of military ambit alternatively independent international committee unaffiliated to globalists’ auspice would be the only sustainable action in terminating intrusions hostile to Syrian peace and political progress.
Needlessly repeating mistakes and fundamentally flawed strategies to attain individual goals is celebrating failures many times over notwithstanding emblematic erroneous decisions expediting inevitable disaster.
Syrian solidarity could contribute to prolonging truce and initiating peaceful negotiations between government and citizenry like exhibited in referendum for constitutional reform.
There is tremendous potential in Syrian society to amicably resolve the year old crisis and with government unequivocal submission to non-violence and peaceful means,
The outside elements stirring confrontation could be easily eliminated directing focus on delivering political changes to people satisfaction.
Finally, UN assignment limited to peaceful oversight i.e. non-militaristic in any shape or form and humanitarian aid would be honorable for the international organization under scrutiny to prove reliability in rising to the occasion.
With Syrian peace in thoughts and prayers,
Good Luck to Syrian people and the government in adhering to ceasefire and adopting holistic approach to democratic transition.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://youtu.be/h0QuewZcbPc http://youtu.be/ff7_gM_SoAk http://youtu.be/SL1zruqQAYU http://youtu.be/BzQsMMJ31Jo http://youtu.be/G0R2Fc0cx_I http://youtu.be/wq9854P0blk http://youtu.be/h0QuewZcbPc http://youtu.be/5EOfE3z-eFM
Syria – Ceasefire Sustenance and Peace Plan
April 13, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
The ceasefire in Syria from both sides is welcome since peaceful environment necessary for humanitarian relief to war victims besides starting political negotiations with authority.
Syrian government and opposition exercising restraints to prevent any foreign instigated provocation are vital to maintain fragile truce.
Meanwhile keeping rebel factions offshore considering they are mostly hired by nations to stir confrontation would prolong desirable conduciveness to initiate peace talks and implementation of recently held constitutional referendum.
President Bashar Al Assad willingness to invite Syrian civil society for constructive dialogue would be instrumental to gain credibility strengthening national interest.
The incumbent government preparedness to address all groups within society demonstrating inclusive secular policy is extremely important to restore political stability setting the stage for democratic process.
Although government vigilance to curtail violence essential for national security,
Any procrastination towards meaningful political resolutions would be an impetus for external powers to resume civil unrest that could be avoided in expediting systematic structural political reform to public satisfaction.
Syrian society discernment in choosing their representatives pledged to common democratic goals are paramount for political success.
Again solidarity among civilians transcending religion, sect, social and economic barriers would guarantee realization of anticipated political transformation reflecting republic rule.
Independent international monitoring along with overseas media barring national destabilization motives could evaluate ground reality.
United Nations Security Council unbiased participation would legitimize role as a reliable agent in the delicate political situation demanding pragmatic solutions and balanced views for general consensus among members in recognition of Syrian sovereignty.
After nearly fifteen months of bloodshed and turmoil,
President Bashar Al Assad government is at the crossroads to establish genuine peace and political progress in adherence to referendum mandate as the preliminary yet monumental step towards democracy with sincere commitment to honor broad spectrum changes without further delay and loss of innocent lives.
On that optimistic expectation, wishing people in Syria and the authority a peaceful reconciliation for smooth democratic transition.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Syria – Ceasefire and UN deadline
April 10, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Syrian conflict between the government and western as well as Arab league nations backed rebels has claimed many innocent lives besides stalling UN and Arab league envoy Kofi Annan led peace plan.
The recent conference – Friends of Syria held in Istanbul among United States and allies i.e. the west, Saudi Arabia, Qatar including the host nation Turkey is preoccupied in legitimizing Syrian National Council synonymous to National Transition Council in Libya comprising fragmented rebels to represent Syrian population.
Whereas, Syrian mainstream has categorically declared western backed armed rebels as foreign fighters hired by nations determined to lead the political crisis into civil war for specific goal – regime change to advance their agenda against Iran.
Syria is used as pawn by the west and key Arab allies – Saudi Arabia, Qatar and NATO partner Turkey.
Turkey involvement is intriguing with the Islamic nation proudly proclaimed the only democratic society amongst Arab and Muslim countries in that territory.
Furthermore, the refugee exodus from Syria into Turkey across the border since rival forces clashes should pre-empt the Mediterranean neighbor to be a peace catalyst not the contrary.
Evidently, United States and western nations are least interested in peace and political stability in Syria or for that matter democracy in Middle East.
UN and Arab league envoy Kofi Annan peace proposal to Syrian authority for government troops withdrawal and ceasefire were accepted with draw down began in the relatively calm cities across the nation.
Meanwhile, the Turkey conference pledging arms supply and funds to rebels mostly consisting mercenaries like in Libya have been advised to reject ceasefire and emboldened to continue fighting on behalf of foreign nations anchored on toppling Syrian government for vested interests.
Syrian armed forces accordingly have been deployed on counter insurgency operation to defend the country from foreign invasion.
Reiterating earlier statements on Syria and Arab Spring in general – Citizens revolutions throughout Middle East were initially peaceful and remained committed to non-violent assembly until western infiltration with armed fighters posing as protesters steered the democratic premise into potential mutiny for government removal.
Western, Saudi Arabia and Qatar obsession with regime change in Syria is sanctimonious and counterproductive considering the players specifically –
Saudi Arabia and Qatar are iconic for oppression and persecution of their citizens in practicing medieval capital punishments such as beheading, live burials and stoning to death…in twenty first century.
Similarly, United States adherence to torture and indefinite detention without trial in Guantanamo Bay, renditions with CIA secret prison in Poland and Eastern Europe,
Executive order on unconstitutional NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) targeting United States citizens for military trial denying due process…are few of the many crimes against humanity condemned by human rights organizations at home and abroad.
Notwithstanding post 9/11 systemic abuse of power raising credibility factor for United States in the forefront for regime elimination in Middle East.
United States and west along with Arab league bear responsibility in exacerbating Syrian political unrest through relentless support to rebels triggering arms race on both sides alongside suppressing UN peace efforts from fruition.
Syrian political movement has been transformed into national security issue with western and Arab league intrusion hindering citizens’ option to pursue constitutional reform and other political changes agreed by the government in the referendum for democratic transition.
The rebels not being part of Syrian society need not be engaged in misleading Syrian political cause.
Considering the deteriorating situation from western and Arab league instigated rebel factions,
United States and allies objectives for radical modification in Syria will not succeed,
The persistence to destabilize the nation and the region will not be tolerated in silence with cataclysmic consequences to befall on over-ambitious globalists aiming for world dominance under false pretexts earlier in Libya and now in Syria.
Syrian people were on the path of meaningful negotiations with the government only to be derailed by the so-called Friends of Syria – a disoriented and fractured militia acting at external powers behest promoting death and destruction for strategic gains against Iran.
United States and allies share the burden to prove their commitment to peace prospects and any hope for democracy in Syria by refraining from violence via the rebels to facilitate concurrent ceasefire.
Subsequently Syrian civil society direct dialogue with President Bashar Al Assad is essential to expedite referendum mandate maintaining transparency for mass approval.
Upon immediate termination of killings and raids, Syrian government armed security personnel is to retreat from civilian environment enabling humanitarian relief to the wounded and displaced victims in the war torn nation.
The rebels are to be identified of their origin and any foreign nationals deported from the country to prevent terror network establishment in the interim or later.
Both party could no longer prolong Syrian dispute for undue advantage and three preliminary steps are instantaneously required to avoid drastic response against peace obstructionists and they are-
Complete and unconditional disarmament on all sides without exception is necessary to initiate peaceful political resolution.
Referendum outcome made effective in addition to adopting constructive political course for successful democratic process.
International independent committee barring western and Arab league influence to monitor government measures to public satisfaction.
Humanitarian agencies and International media entry into Syria especially investigative journalists non-affiliated to biased entities viz. certain corporate media, nations identified as hostile to Syrian peace…would be helpful to evaluate ground reality.
United States and allies are urged to exercise restraint and abandon self-detrimental interference in Syria.
In anticipation for an end to political turmoil in Syria,
Good Luck to people in Syria for peace and republic governed democracy.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://youtu.be/wq9854P0blk http://youtu.be/G0R2Fc0cx_I http://youtu.be/BzQsMMJ31Jo
India – Political Sea Change on the Horizon
April 6, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Subsequent to dismal results for Congress in five State assembly elections in March 2012,
The most recent by-elections in southern and western states of India has proven disastrous for the ruling power United Progressive Alliance (UPA II), the Congress Party under Mrs. Sonia Gandhi leadership with other members –
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Home Minister P.Chidambaram, Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, Law Minister Salman Khurshid, and MP Veerappa Molly…holding key cabinet positions at the center.
Congress party being incumbent in the state and central government had a stronghold in the southern state – Andhra Pradesh sworn loyalty to Gandhi – Nehru family with guaranteed victory considering the political party representation from AP reportedly was 33 seats exceeding the electorally key state Uttar Pradesh (UP) in northern India.
However, the by-elections outcome reversed the status quo with regional report confirming that Congress party targeted all seven Assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh and lost all of them by significant margins ranging from 30,000 – 45,000 votes and coastal region performance apparently a colossal failure with some Congress candidates fearing security deposit forfeiture.
Congress led UPA – India’s major political party electoral debacle could be attributed to two major issues confronting the state – secessionism within state territory – Telangana seeking autonomy and rights to self-determination from Andhra Pradesh with decadent feudalism facilitating minority abuse of power over majority.
Congress Party as the State and national authority refusal to address the victims’ plight comprising farmers and marginalized mainstream led to massive protests and state shut down with huge revenue loss that could have been avoided through peaceful settlement by the government.
The second factor being corruption among State Congress members having become nationwide epidemic precipitated political defeat for both national parties – UPA II the current administration and major opposition BJP succumbed to electoral backlash.
Further the central government rejection of strong Jan Lokpal bill i.e. anti-corruption law protecting political class with impunity is the impetus driving electorate to demonstrate ballot power.
Similarly in Maharashtra with Mumbai as the capital and commercial center, Congress setback from municipal to state legislative seats is poignant resonating popular demand for corruption free society governed by real democracy barring nepotism and dynasty allegiance to globalist power.
State elections thus far with Uttar Pradesh up north and Andhra Pradesh down south is a huge disappointment to Congress party especially for present Gandhi family at the center,
The regional parties trouncing them across the nation is indicative of the beginning of the end of dominion republic rule reining control under the guise of democracy.
Transfer of Power rather than surrender of power in 1947 and subsequently in 1949 general rights briefing via constitution erroneously assumed as transformation to republic rule with national sovereignty still remaining under British Crown instead of Indian republic.
India under British Commonwealth of Nations shares the status with counterparts Australia and Canada in this regard.
Congress Party founded by Alan Octavian Hume during colonial era maintains undemocratic laws passed in 1878 until today alongside mute opposition committing sacrilege in temple of democracy – the Parliament.
Specifically the prevalent laws subjugating citizens to sustain authoritarianism somehow escapes Parliament members attention despite unprecedented fasting over ten years and other peaceful protests by civilians in the beleaguered regions of the country.
The Arms Act now known as AFSPA – Armed Forces Special Powers Act – the ramifications witnessed in North East and Kashmir Valley under national security pretext judiciously in compliance with globalist policy – governance by guns eliminating peace prospects and constructive dialogue.
Vernacular Press Act passed in the same year 1878 enacting press censorship and crackdown on civilian dissent critical of the government continues with same velocity in the twenty first century evidenced in the civilian death Rajbala at the anti-corruption rally in New Delhi.
Ironically the power granted by the people to the elected officials used against them with excess force, income tax raids, intelligence agencies 24/7 surveillance and denying due process on false allegations… are common political measures to exert authority.
Government and corporate collusion undermining democracy with corruption seeping into army barracks in lucrative deals and contracts is the expansion of globalist agenda aimed at world dominance by discrediting nations through puppet regimes deliberate sabotage of economic progress not to mention the threat to sovereignty emanating from persistent external influence.
The two large political party system in India with the rest disoriented, there is an urgent need to fill the void in the absence of formidable political representation for the people restoring law and order in the political lawlessness extended into other branches of public and private enterprise.
Anti-corruption legislation viz. Jan Lokpal bill, Right to Reject and Right to Recall – the overwhelming requests from electorate will not be promoted by government and other political factions due to conflict of interest and lack of political will.
The alternative to the dilemma is India against corruption i.e. IAC coalescence with substantial membership across the nation forming a political party and contesting elections to give electorate a fair option in the local, state and national elections.
Then IAC could achieve political reform as legislators instead of activists given the political establishment defiance in passing robust Jan Lokpal bill even though corruption is a monumental problem decimating the moral and ethical pillars in society.
The civil society genuine concerns regarding corruption dismissed as intrusion in Parliamentary affairs by political machinery evading investigation and prosecution for treason, embezzlement and violation of constitutional law as well as Parliament sanctity proved in cash for votes in Parliament and during elections to public office.
IAC upon being elected delivering promises post elections in Parliament, State assembly, city and municipality would strengthen democracy with a new chapter defining Indian political future.
Again IAC in solidarity could shape the political landscape starting from local to national heights and lead India in turbulent times in history ending foreign demagoguery and sophistry declining proposals beneficial to nation at large.
Indian electoral mandate in the latest elections clarify republic power in changing political dynamics slighted by elected representatives against the convention not to hurt the source or reverse could happen given voters are the decision makers in a democratic environment.
Proceeding with the trend in forthcoming elections would yield republic empowerment.
India awakening to reality on political accountability legitimized in voters’ discernment is the tip of the iceberg with imminent sea change on the horizon.
Congratulations! To winners in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra on the political victory in by-polls.
Good Luck to India against corruption (IAC) with the new millennium political party pledged to greater good of the people and the nation.
Jai Bharat! Vande Mataram!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://youtu.be/6XhMP0GmPqI http://youtu.be/6omFdlOvugk http://youtu.be/XzzXDvZ_-Oc http://youtu.be/mU6e2LEeLTg http://youtu.be/0Zth_VXjj60 http://youtu.be/Ksx_fYtCbN4 http://youtu.be/qqnIrt3pUqw http://youtu.be/l6Fu77Eh3uw http://youtu.be/FH0WM446iXs http://youtu.be/lWsGPxp4s1w http://youtu.be/ddrx8288qwA
Myanmar – Landslide Victory for NLD in by-elections
April 3, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Heartfelt Congratulations! To citizens of Myanmar, National League for Democracy and leadership Aung San Suu Kyi on the landslide victory in by-elections paving way for democracy currently as strong and legitimate opposition soon evolving into republic ruling power at the center.
Myanmar has long been denied political freedom and fundamental rights to elect genuine representation committed to public and national interest.
After great sacrifices and struggles over decades, the ray of hope emerging through NLD under internationally renowned leadership of Aung San Suu Suki guarantees optimism for the South East Asian nation.
Myanmar President Thein Sein and military junta recognition of the electoral mandate is welcome more so on the political reforms exemplified in holding by-elections – the preliminary step towards democracy with anticipated rapid development on the horizon.
The conciliatory response to people’s democratic aspirations is a positive sign and maintaining the inclusive policy for equal and fair political opportunity to all regardless of demographic strength would broaden national prospects across the spectrum.
Political system receptive to democracy eliminating military governance from civilian rule is crucial for true democratic functionality beginning with constitutional amendment in this regard and civil liberty to pledge irreversible status.
Military confined to safeguarding security in the national frontiers rather than involvement in Parliamentary affair is best suited enhancing the institution’s unique responsibility and disciplinary character that could bring forth the defense academy respect and appreciation for democracy.
The election outcome favoring NLD is an affirmation for sea change in political landscape imperative for nation building and economic revival.
Military representatives amid civilian elected legislators arguably form the basis for domestic and international concerns delaying democratic process into fruition.
The military intervention in politics threatens democracy subjugating population despite opposition bipartisanship on some legislative issues creating a false perception of public acceptance amongst army hierarchy not necessarily synchronized with reality.
Myanmar government preparation to move forward with other political reforms focused on peace and reconciliation with ethnic groups would be an important milestone and a paradigm shift from the contemporary trend using military might and brutal force.
Similarly in dealing with secessionism largely arising from disenfranchisement, gross economic and social inequality marred with violence often leads to fierce confrontation ultimately resulting in civil war.
The armed conflict aimed at right to self-determination and federalism confronted with the dilemma of ceasefire or political negotiations between government and opposing factions could not be addressed without mutual agreement to end fighting and,
Meanwhile organizing peace talks for amicable resolutions on all relevant matter would expedite desperately required humanitarian relief to victims caught in crossfire.
The government procrastination or rebels default could jeopardize the fragile initiatives and keeping promises is incumbent upon on all sides to arrive at a general consensus for national benefit.
Myanmar’s request to international community especially the United States to lift economic sanctions in consideration of latest political progress with more in the immediate future is reasonable and highlights the impending actions for comprehensive political transformation required ahead of national elections in 2015.
Trade embargo invariably hurts the people more than the intended target and precipitates economic decline for the country barely surviving in the volatile global economy.
Regional cooperation could perhaps ease the burden with exchange of goods and services strengthening partnerships through exports and imports complementing the balance of trade.
Myanmar has great potential to compete effectively in the global environment provided there is political will to abandon obsolete measures to curb dissent along with divestments from military spending to economic goals.
In acknowledgment of peace and diplomacy combined with by and large free and fair elections that delivered 40 out of 45 Parliamentary seats to NLD,
The status quo confirms the present government’s willingness to accept republic governance conforming to twenty first century timeline bracing the momentum for better economic standards, political liberation and social justice.
On that sanguine note, wishing the people of Myanmar and leaderships tremendous success in all endeavors dedicated to entire society and nation at large.
Peace, republican democracy and prosperity in abundance to Myanmar.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Syria – UNSC Non-binding Statement on Peace Proposal
March 22, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
The fifteen members United Nations Security Council unanimous vote on Syria is welcome in solidarity context but not substance wise.
UNSC non-binding statement proves the seriousness or the lack thereof against legally obligatory resolution adopting peace proposals to end bloodshed in the yearlong violence arguably lucrative to defense industry representing war aspiring nations.
According to the reports UNSC outlined UN and Arab league envoy former Secretary General Kofi Annan’s proposal.
– A cease-fire first by the Syrian government.
– Daily two-hour halt to fighting to evacuate the injured and provide humanitarian aid.
– Inclusive Syrian-led political talks to address the legitimate concerns of the Syrian people.
Whenever peace brokerage targets one party against another, the proposal fails to achieve common goal.
In demanding the government to cease-fire first rather than unconditional multilateral disarmament,
The conspicuous bias poses impediment in honoring the deal especially by the side i.e. Syrian government expected to bear more if not entire responsibility in the armed conflict triggered by western powers and their NATO as well as Arab league allies – Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in particular.
Similarly, the second condition – daily two-hour halt in fighting nullifies ceasefire call generating a perception of indefinite confrontation desirable to peaceful resolution.
Third suggestion on inclusive political talks is viable provided sectarian factor is not induced from external powers specifically Saudi Arabia.
As for fierce fighting in Damascus suburbs and other parts of the country like Homs, Idlib, Hama and Daraa,
Notwithstanding twin suicide bombings in Damascus past weekend followed by a violent eruption in the relatively calm northern city Aleppo – the regime change agenda overwhelms the self-defense analogy to government crackdown.
In this regard, the Islamist group Al-Nusra quoted as a front for Al Qaeda reportedly claimed responsibility for the recent bombings in the capital and second largest city Aleppo.
The explosions were apparently aimed at air force intelligence building and criminal security department killing at least 27 people and several injured in the blast with warnings for repeat incidents in the near future.
Report details Al-Qaeda supporters as Sunni Muslim extremists behind earlier suicide attacks and vowed to continue in the offing.
Interestingly, the contentious issue being President Bashar Al-Assad including other political as well as military leaderships belonging to minority Alawite sect originated from Shiite Islam ruling the majority Sunnis not acceptable to those outside Syria viz. Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
The hostility attributed to Sunni significance undermined in the society and declared the main opposition in the anti-government uprising.
Even though the demography within society might not contest the status considering the secular framework and harmony that prevailed in Syria up until the situation exploited for foreign powers preferred motives applying the usual divide and conquer methodology disregarding the consequences endured by none other than the population they pretend to protect from disenfranchisement.
Poignantly the protest that began in March 2011 was not exclusive or sectarian oriented given the initial nationwide demonstration was non-violent and peaceful focused on political rights and democratic system over dynasty rule emanating from Arab Spring rejecting authoritarianism prevalent throughout the region.
Not even sparing Lebanese democracy constantly threatened by external oppression from Israel and/or U.S., France and Saudi Arabia organized coup d’état in 2010.
Besides the flip side in Bahrain with Shiite majority ruled by Sunni minority – the peaceful rally was crushed with U.S. authorized ad hoc Saudi invasion demolishing Pearl Square monument to erase the stains from proxy government massacre.
Bahraini kingdom maintaining close ties with Saudi dynasty and British Royalty regarded key strategic partner by U.S. and western allies epitomize the height of hypocrisy in the discriminatory decisions on humanitarian issues.
Despite U.N. estimates on Syrian casualties exceeding 8,000,
UNSC action limited to non-binding statement is indicative of members’ preference to escalate violence leading to civil war.
Otherwise UNSC commitment could have passed a credible and enforceable resolution enacting ceasefire on all sides with comprehensive peace agreement promoting democratic transition.
Saudi Arabia proposition to increase oil output in the wake of military options against Syria and Iran to ease economic burden on global society confirms the dynasty’s determination to eliminate Shiite presence let alone dominance in the region,
As major oil producer Saudi Arabia attention is also directed at economic advantage from incessant warfare with substantial fuel consumption required in the military operation.
Saudi disposition diametrically opposite to Islamic values and principles not to mention the religious sacrilege reflected in deeds with grave repercussions for the caretaker of Islam’s holy city Mecca.
United States – the presumed world Super Power is prodded around by two over ambitious allies in the Middle East – Saudi Arabia and Israel vying for regional ascendancy.
Saudi Arabia and Israel viewed Iraq’s former President Saddam Hussein – security threat and facilitated Iraq invasion through 9/11 attacks with hijackers profiles linked to Saudi Arabia of all the Islamic nations around the world.
Yet Afghanistan and not Saudi Arabia invaded and occupied till date.
The strategic vantage from Afghanistan in terms of proximity to oil and natural gas rich Central Asia along with permanent U.S and NATO base to monitor Russia and China is picture-perfect.
Saudi Arabia instigated U.S. intervention in Afghanistan against former Soviet Union and subsequently contributed to Soviet Union collapse with oil price and production manipulation depriving Soviet economic independence from oil resources in the territory.
Saudi Arabia preparation against Iran using same tactics with western powers imposed sanctions against the Islamic Republic is Pavlovian response.
Saudi Arabia intrusion in Bahrain, Yemen and now in Syria has resulted in immense loss of lives plus as purveyor of arms and ammunitions spread militancy preventing democracy in the region and disrupting democratic functionality in other Islamic nations.
Religious fanaticism funded by Saudi Arabia through controversial madrassas in Pakistan foments insurgency and lately pervasive in Central Asian Islamic countries emulating hard line governance to repress citizens in the state.
Saudi Arabia is also well known for iron fist rule with zero tolerance to peaceful and non-violent dissenters martyred for seeking democracy and constitutional reform in the domestic front.
Evidently Saudi Arabia monarchy with power distribution amongst family denying basic rights, prejudicial customs going back to medieval era is enslaved to feudalism thriving on profits from collective productivity allocated to selective class in the hierarchy leaving the rest in abject poverty and lifelong misery.
Israel and Saudi Arabia have many commonalities beginning with geographic location, religious sites, military aggression, subjugation of neighboring states, latest weapon stockpile holders and above all –
United States most favored partners in crimes and capitalist ventures.
Unfortunately, to the victims of two-dimensional Middle East supremacists – the architects of catastrophe in Saudi Arabia and Israel are dual hood serpentine endangering peace, sovereignty and life.
Meanwhile United States sophisticated technology and military might dispensed to serve Israel and Saudi Arabia’s interests at average Americans expense footing the bill on ideology driven extravagant warfare.
Finally, Syrian crisis is a litmus test for UNSC in defining the actual purpose and the burden of proof is upon the core members with political clout.
With Syrian peace prospects in prayers, Wishing success for smooth political and humanitarian relief to citizens in Syria.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://youtu.be/fiOKpxB3gh0 http://youtu.be/DGp1_24xIV8 http://youtu.be/HdV-LaIVO_s http://youtu.be/gzubE_HkqBw http://youtu.be/BJJNIxV-Kjw http://youtu.be/w0HDVvCu3UY http://youtu.be/Uw1-T3hHSEE http://youtu.be/ctjNMyzREgc http://youtu.be/OsusnyalA_c http://youtu.be/ueWSlecVAu4 http://youtu.be/RkaXLr1oO0w http://youtu.be/9aUxwP9Zy2Q
U.S. and Allies War and Peace Quagmire – Global Dominance Part I
March 20, 2012
By Padmini Arhant
Arab Spring invoking optimism for millions oppressed throughout Middle East without exception deviated from course through western intervention in concerted effort to accomplish overarching regime change agenda with specific goal – Global dominance.
The democratic prospects during and post revolution consistently undermined with U.S. and allies overt and covert operations in Egypt, Tunisia, Bahrain, Yemen, Libya and now in Syria.
Egypt – According to reports – U.S. military aid $1.3 billion to Egypt is expected to resume this week per Obama administration sources to strengthen relations with Egyptian ruling authority Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) against Congressional law passed in December 2011 prohibiting financial assistance to Egypt until basic freedom and human rights restored by military power.
The reports also claim that amount will be transferred in smaller proportions to prevent any present or future anti-US elements in power from gaining access to funds.
Otherwise funding to Egypt is aimed at procuring unconditional loyalty regardless of SCAF gross human rights violation since governance.
Tahrir Square revolt led to ousting key western ally and military masquerade ex-President Hosni Mubarak in early 2011.
The western strategy to curb Islamic fundamentalism with dictatorship in Middle East is subversion of reality.
The actions thus far curtail functional democracy allowing fundamentalists and hard line authoritarianism to prevail in the first ever elections barring viable alternatives for citizens due to western controlled puppet regimes at the helm.
Egypt is a classic example in this regard and western alliance with military power continues to pose impediments in citizens’ quest for political independence.
The steps subsequent to Mubarak overthrow though lauded by west as democratic reflecting western concept of democracy in twenty first century,
The people in Egypt feel betrayed by Egyptian military facilitating Muslim Brotherhood victory – the victim of Mubarak brutality yet remained non-participant in Tahrir Square freedom struggle while the secular mass shed blood on their behalf.
Then emerged opportunistically clinching power as expected per SCAF managed election with constraints on other political factions to effectively compete in the western touted so-called democratic process.
The western powers having settled scores with Egypt revolution for their partner Mubarak removal vigorously engaged in the military takeover maintaining predecessor autocratic rule.
Furthermore, Muslim Brotherhood coalition with Islamic fundamentalists is a deliberate option to sustain public dissatisfaction and political fragility prevalent under such conditions enabling permanent military proxy governance for western maneuver.
Egypt citizens relentless dissent to western engineered political outcome could be advanced in solidarity with a political party encompassing diverse needs under strong dynamic secular leadership in the forthcoming Presidential election.
Unity in recognition of Egypt society as one nation shunning political ideology or radicalism is imperative to challenge the external influenced state authority.
Syria – The year long violence with massive casualties from all sides has stained the ruling and foreign forces alike unrelenting to international call for ceasefire.
President Bashar Al-Assad in pursuing eye for an eye stratagem is exacerbating the confrontation rather than leading the country towards non-violent and diplomatic exchange with Syrian people for democratic transition.
The constitutional reform limiting Presidential tenure to two terms and opening pathway for mainstream candidates in Presidential race are significant compared with position held until recently on citizens’ grievances typically ignored in order to prolong status quo.
President Assad ending violence with troops withdrawal across the country beginning with Damascus, Aleppo and oil producing province Deir Al Zor would determine foreign infiltration in these areas that are not easily verifiable in the clashes between government and armed rebels sharing equal responsibility in the bloodshed and non-conducive environment for humanitarian relief to save lives.
Moreover releasing peaceful protestors like Mohammad Sayeed Rassas, a leader of the National Coordinating Body for Democratic Change (NCB) arrested on Sunday along with others committed to non-violence and against foreign intervention for a constructive dialogue with government are important to prove President Assad’s respect for civil liberty and Syrian lives in general.
Simultaneously foreign intrusion has ignited sparks turning into inferno with the objective to steer the nation towards civil war.
Western powers together with Arab league’s economic and military powerhouses – Saudi Arabia and Qatar in particular have constantly interfered in Middle East uprising viz. Bahrain, Yemen, Libya and currently in Syria.
It is extremely disappointing to note Turkey playing a role in regional destabilization – the inevitable upon extending Syrian conflict with severe backlash for all contributors in the mayhem caused by arms influx displaying utter disregard for innocent civilians dying in crossfire.
United Nations and Arab League’s envoy former Secretary General Kofi Annan visits to Syria to broker peace is positive and peace proposals for humanitarian purpose is noteworthy.
However, UNSC resolution for air strikes or ground attacks against Syria in semblance with response on Libya would be counterproductive and could seriously jeopardize UNSC credibility amongst civilian population in Syria as well as across the globe.
Syria has reached the optimum in chaos and incessant killings with ammunition sales flourishing at the cost of precious lives,
Notwithstanding lingering tensions in Middle East impact oil prices with ripple effects on food and other necessities around the world.
Above all escalating economic liabilities for the west restraints extravagant ventures like military invasion of Syria or Iran.
President Bashar Al Assad peaceful reconciliation with people in Syria could unequivocally avert Libya or Iraq scenario providing international community opportunity to rescue the dying and heal the wounded in the war torn nation.
Meanwhile western powers and Arab league integrity and sincerity in resolving Syrian crisis is largely dependent on abandoning aggression and possible economic sanctions hurting the people than the intended target.
Instead disarmament of Free Syrian Army and different oppositions alongside enforcing government troops retreat for promoting comprehensive peace agreement would benefit the people and nation at large.
Over twelve months of battle between government and foreign powers backed resistance has deprived citizens from negotiations,
Besides referendum on constitutional amendment deserves implementation to validate electorate mandate.
Syrian and international leaderships are urged to seek cordial relations to achieve the common goal – peace and political stability with republic governed democracy.
Best Wishes to citizens of Egypt and Syria for long lasting peace and republic rule establishment.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/03/20123231597719505.html
PadminiArhant.com