Stardom and Parasitic Culture

May 9, 2023

Stardom

and

Parasitic Culture

Padmini Arhant

The requests on topic – parasitic culture among those who flaunt stardom, celebrity status, wealth, power etc. is addressed.

The references were made with politics and the other was regarding Indian women from Indian film industry consecutively flopping in Hollywood and American TV shows…

Response:

In order to understand the issue, it is important to know that parasitic culture is rampant in this category famished for fame, fortune and power.

To begin with, those from Indian film industry cast in Hollywood productions and entertainment TV shows that are successively declared a disaster in rating and revenue, the so-called stardom comes from piggy back existence which in itself is parasitic by definition and in decorum.

Original delivers natural performance unlike fake or impostor faltering with inevitable failure.

The other question in the related topic was;

What’s up with Indian celebrity trend to rent-a-womb?

Response : surrogacy or rent-a-uterus i.e. human incubator is a privilege widely availed by those like you have referenced in your question.

It is also another form of flamboyance in these instances that rich and so-called famous can buy anything including a womb ignoring options such as adoption.

The rent-a-womb prevalent in the Indian celebrity-hood rather than adoption of a child especially in a nation like India with overwhelming population living in extreme poverty and amongst them significant percentage of children in shelter besides many enduring hunger, disease and societal abuse is an unfortunate tragedy.

United Nations latest report presenting population data for India as the most populous nation on earth leaving China behind in this contest only exacerbate  the situation for the impoverished in the country.

Furthermore, adopting a child as opposed to surrogacy viz. renting human incubator is a tall order for those typically exploitative by nature, living life throughout as beneficiary evolving into career at other’s contributions and labor.

Such character assuming benefactor role adopting a child from India or elsewhere would be detrimental to a child raised in an environment not conducive and relevantly deprived of genuine love and care.

Parasitic culture is inherent heritage with the end justifying the means for those in the pseudo hall of fame, sham and scam.

Padmini Arhant

PadminiArhant.com

Prakrithi.PadminiArhant.com

Who is Who?

January 17, 2015

By Padmini Arhant

In the desperate attempt to avert inevitable ending of status quo deceptive tactics are deployed misleading the world.

Hence the global citizens – the victims in particular exercising discernment for disillusionment is necessary.

How do you distinguish between original entity and a fake entity or a phony?

The physical appearance, personal qualities as well as profile being unique with specific DNA isolating even offspring from parents, the convoluted practice suggesting every other person as the original entity defies logic and basic intelligence.

Notwithstanding the devious scheme is pejorative for the source and the lackeys reflecting on their character.

Original entity characteristics are inherent with uncompromising values making the individual distinctive and reliable during good and especially bad times prioritizing humanity interest above self besides sincere commitment, integrity and courage to face challenges in the mission.

Not to mention the endurance on relentless attacks comprising condescendence, ridicule, prejudice and false portrayal to discredit the selfless genuine contributions thus far.

Unlike the fake entity or a phony, conspicuously a crony and demonstrably attracted to incentives in the quid pro quo revealing complicity in fraudulence and fiduciary act.

While the original entity is transparent, the fake entity remains in disguise with flawed performance unable to sustain the charade lacking in credibility.

Original entity is independent, diligent and extemporaneous on issues juxtaposed the fake entity following the script in the theatrical presentation laden with appeasements confirming disingenuous trait.

The original entity is the prime target for incriminations and negative connotations contradictory to positive role in personal and public life.

Simultaneously the fake entity protected under political immunity in criminal activity and willful engagement in violations and abuse of status.

Despite egregious and abominable decisions denying  reality, the fact of the matter is the representation delineating the original entity from the fake i.e. the pseudo  cast with the former representing the indomitable natural force whereas the latter component of the decaying process expediting decline with presumptuousness as doctrine.

Interestingly the pack of hyenas scavenging on corpses as cannibal sponsors and promoting violence in the fast and furious programs proliferating terror, arms sales and narcotic trade making references such as the lone wolf attack citing the original entity dedicated to peace and non-violence is indeed the irony – once again depicting the irreconcilable difference in the fait accompli.

Finally, the unlimited imitations viz. the impostor cannot possibly become the original.

Peace to all!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant