Ukraine – Public Discernment Critical to Protect Sovereignty And National Interest

December 10, 2013

By Padmini Arhant

Ukraine like Thailand experiencing foreign powers staged protests against the incumbent government decisions to decline EU Association Agreement on trade and NATO membership.

The ongoing clashes prove that sovereignty is threatened upon prioritizing national interests over shadow organizations agenda.

Similar scenario is prevalent in Afghanistan regarding the bilateral security agreement (BSA) seeking continuation of status quo involving killing innocent children, women and men during night raids and drone attacks with immunity.

Ukraine signing the treaty with EU would be allowing International Monetary Fund (IMF) to impose demands invariably resulting in economic setbacks rather than recovery evident in IMF loans to developing nations across the globe.

The international financial institutions such as the World Bank, IMF, ECB, Bank of England and the Federal Reserve in the United States trajectory preserves bankers holdings while creating fictitious debts on the respective economies depriving growth with national revenue appropriated mostly towards interest payments and deficit control implementing severe austerity.

EU pressure on Ukraine inciting violence and political chaos using opposition groups and fake demonstrations confirms the desperation to destabilize the independent state for subjugation.

Ukraine being export oriented economy weighing the pros and cons prior to engagement with EU that is yet to address deep economic recession within the bloc arguably necessitates prudence in choosing trade partners capable to meet expectations and returns leading to mutually beneficial commerce.

Accordingly, Ukraine preference for Russia or any other nation in this instance is sovereign right and could not be forced to deal with EU considering the consequences witnessed in the financial crisis inflicted on Mediterranean countries viz. Greece and Cyprus depleting national treasury including citizens deposit savings to accommodate unreasonable bailout conditions favoring entities at ECB, IMF and World Bank.

The arrangement with requirements for unilateral commitment denying fair opportunity is not viable and produce undesirable outcome.

Instead EU focus on existing problems amongst members with effective strategies could promote trust and reliance for meaningful relations in the region. 

The weak and volatile euro zone premised on boosting monetary gains for banking industry and undue advantage to developed nations with market accessibility restricting equal access to the rest cause hindrance in pervasive economic development.

On the political issue, EU interference in Ukraine’s internal affairs not limited to the former President Yulia Tymoshenko health status. 

Again EU concern in this regard would be genuine in exemplifying synonymous response to Syrian conflict extending and not lifting arms embargo  despite the measure exacerbating humanitarian plight.

Likewise EU influence on United States to close Guantanamo Bay and release detainees on indefinite hunger strike and honoring P5+1 and Iran nuclear pact with sanctions removal are few examples that would prove EU sincerity in alleviating human suffering. 

Ukraine position not to join NATO is appropriate given the latter track record in foreign invasion and human rights violations notwithstanding the misuse of allies viz. Turkey drawn into Syrian war and Patriot missiles installation along with troops deployment under false pretext in that state essentially constitutes surrender of power. 

President Viktor Yanukovych and Prime Minister Mykola Azarov exercising diligence on these issues is responsible and pragmatic for these steps could avert potential economic disaster currently shared among EU member states i.e. Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain (PIGS).

Additionally, NATO alliance disapproval would prevent the possibility to undermine statehood.

Public discernment is critical in rejecting external authorities plan to stir tensions in the country and standing behind the present government leaderships would guarantee freedom.

The pseudo governance exerting authority on sovereign nations is the trend in an attempt to appoint proxy rule to national detriment.

Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych administration practical course could deliver economic progress and hence en masse support is important to defend the nation from turmoil.

Ukraine political stability and economic benefits would be compromised in proceeding with foreign elements organized unrest. The citizens bear responsibility to rescue the nation from unnecessary standoff at global forces behest.

Ukraine solidarity with current government in confronting challenges would ease the situation and facilitate economic prospects in entirety.

Ukraine citizens are urged to refrain from participation in anti-republic and anti-democratic demonstrations aimed at sabotage of able government.

Wishing Ukraine population and leaderships – President Viktor Yanukovych and Prime Minister Mykola Azarov as well as all political factions peaceful resolution on national matter to maintain security and liberty barring foreign infiltration. 

Peace to Ukraine!

Peace to all!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
Preferences
§
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
=
Backspace
Tab
q
w
e
r
t
y
u
i
o
p
[
]
Return
capslock
a
s
d
f
g
h
j
k
l
;
\
shift
`
z
x
c
v
b
n
m
,
.
/
shift
English
alt
alt
Preferences

Comments

Got something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.