India – Political Party Members Defection and Rivals Coalition

May 2, 2019

India – Political Party Members Defection and Rivals Coalition

Padmini Arhant

Ex-Army Soldier Reports at the Press Conference on Narendra Modi Negotiators’ Bribe Offer of 50 Crores 

500 million Rupees or face Murder upon non-withdrawal from the race in Varanasi against Narendra Modi

 

The myth on Narendra Modi Lehar (Wave) is debunked to be Narendra Modi Zehar (Poison) consuming innocent lives and democracy on the whole. 

The ex-BSF soldier Tej Bahadur Yadav’s nomination papers were cancelled at BJP contestant Narendra Modi’s order using 3G Spectrum (Goons, Guns & Gutter politics).

Meanwhile, Uttar Pradesh political party SP delegating the ex-BSF Tej Bahadur Yadav to rally behind their original nominee, Congress Party defector Shalini Yadav is least surprising.

The stunt apparently capitalizing on soldier’s publicity and perhaps any endorsement without realizing that are not necessarily transferable especially in the people vs. political regimes alternating power absent delivery on electorate issues is political expediency.

The development confirms politics typical nature to ride on mobilizers backs rather than rely on self-productivity.

Politics maneuvers and opportunistic tactics are well known and Indian politics is no different in this respect and are seasoned in getting ahead of the game at others expense.

The political defections from one party to another in Indian politics besides coalitions among parties who were bitter rivals in recent memory are ad nauseam and carried out without any shame or inhibition with the common goal of winning at all costs by hook or crook revealing politics colorful character.

Only politics were to have any good character, the same would be reflected in governance. Unfortunately, politics ever remains up for sale bargaining voters trust for power and personal fortune.

Additionally, the criminal underworld funded corrupt entertainment industry along with crony media joining forces for propaganda politics is yet another equipment of political apparatus.

Narendra Modi and Amit Shah duo are veterans in twisting arms often beyond the political victim and targets being hamstrung resulting in casualty or fatality. The violent cowardly techniques enabled these two entities reach the helm in politics precisely on 3G Spectrum (Goons, Guns & Gutter politics).

Narendra Modi’s survival in politics has been eliminating opposition not by wit or credible legacy instead through devious strategy and divisive politics.

The formidable contender like the ex-BSF soldier Tej Bahadur Yadav removed from the playing field is testimony to Narendra Modi jittery having nothing to claim in terms of positive performance in the past five years except inflicting economic pain and misery in the name of demonetization, GST and soaring unemployment besides exacerbating defense force as well as agrarian crises.

The seismic activity from the ex-BSF Tej Bahadur Yadav’s candidacy rocked BJP’’s canoe on Varanasi Ghat (banks) triggering panic attacks on Narendra Modi’s electability inevitably set to sink than stay afloat in the Holy Ganges.

The incumbent candidate Narendra Modi has miserably failed in all aspects with a dismal track record evident in voter backlash experienced by the government in the state elections with BJP losing all five states 0-5 in October last year i.e. 2018.

Narendra Modi severely lacking in ingenuity and originality, however crafty in 3G Spectrum (Goons, Guns and Gutter politics) have bribed and/or threatened members in politics, judiciary and institutions responsible for monitoring and investigating events.

In this context, the ex-BSF soldier Tej Bahadur  Yadav’s latest revelation on BJP Narendra Modi’s negotiators offering him 50 crores i.e. 500 million rupees or deal with possible murder to drop out of the race might be alarming for many but then the trend is long maintained and contemporarily active on candidate Narendra Modi’s own accounts.

The allegations of horse trading and jockeying for power were leveled against BJP’s B.S. Yeddyurappa government and Narendra Modi in the southern state Karnataka. The news reports verified that MLAs lured with cash to sabotage the local party and Congress alliance over there.

In the past month, Narendra Modi boasted on taking over 40 successful candidates of Trinamool Congress (TMC) in West Bengal post election to dent the TMC Chief Mamata Banerjee’s chances of retaining government and CM post in that state.

Excerpt – Financial Express Report 

“Modi’s big claim in West Bengal: 40 TMC legislators in touch with me, will desert Mamata Banerjee post-May 23”

Not long ago, Narendra Modi as part of three member committee comprising other than self, the CJI nominee Supreme Court justice AK Sikri and Opposition leader Mallikarjun Kharge successfully removed the Supreme Court reinstated then CBI director Alok Verma for daring to proceed with corruption inquiry against Narendra Modi’s business partner on CBI radar for nefarious dealings costing Indian taxpayers money.

The news reports in public domain stated that the opposition leader Mallikarjun Kharge dissenting on the decision to replace CBI Director Alok Verma at that time, Narendra Modi adopted his usual trick to win justice AK Sikri’s vote by promising the panel member a lucrative position post retirement from the judiciary.

Headlines – Economic Times

Government nominates Justice AK Sikri to Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal

Sources in the Ministry of External Affairs said the decision regarding AK Sikri’s nomination was made last month in view of his retirement on March 6, 2019, from the Supreme Court.

Last but not the least the following video categorically establish Narendra Modi’s rise to political stardom based on 3G Spectrum ( Goons, Guns & Gutter politics) is incontrovertible. 

Criminal life of Amit Shah & Narendra Modi

Save democracy and protect hard fought  freedom in secular India.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

Author & Presenter PadminiArhant.com

Prakrithi.PadminiArhant.com

 

 

 

 

 

India – Narendra Modi’s Challenger in Varanasi

April 28, 2019

India – Ex-Army BSF Soldier Tej Bahadur Yadav

vs

Narendra Modi  

Padmini Arhant

 

The presumptuous outgoing Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared himself unopposed contestant from Varanasi creating the false impression propagated by crony media that none are coming forward to challenge the incumbent Prime Minister adding out of fear and concern for the exiting PM’s hyped pseudo popularity and so-called formidability.

However, man proposes and God disposes the myth. 

The ex-army Border Security Force (BSF) service member Tej Bahadur Yadav removed from service by PM Narendra Modi government for his courageous exposure of corruption at various levels in the civil and military administration calls the bluff on PM Narendra Modi and positioned against the high profile and highly controversial Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The videos presented below are worth every Indian electorate attention to learn, understand and act to save democracy and protect freedom at stake under corrupt political regimes more so under PM Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh, Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj cadre. 

Ex-Serviceman BSF Tej Bahadur Yadav vs. Narendra Modi in Varanasi

 

>

 

 

Full Interview of Sacked BSF Jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav – Fighting against Modi in Elections 2019

 

 

 

 

 

बनारस में चुनाव हुआ असली चौकीदार बनाम नकली चौकीदार

Benares to choose real chowkidar (watchman) Tej Bahadur Yadav over fake chowkidar (Narendra Modi) 

 

 

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

Author & Presenter PadminiArhant.com

Prakrithi.PadminiArhant.com

Indian Sub Continent – India Pakistan NSA Talks Cancellation

August 24, 2015

By Padmini Arhant

India and Pakistan national security advisors talks cancellation is regrettable and reveals lack of commitment in saving lives from terrorism.

Pakistan invitation to Kashmir separatists Hurriyat Conference and factions alike prior to NSA meeting scheduled on August 24, 2015 in New Delhi and demand to include Kashmir issue in the bilateral discussion rather than focus on terror in entirety is deviation from past and present official agreements.

The recent terror attacks in India – Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir and Gurdaspur, Punjab deserves unequivocal attention considering repeat events leading to terror networks in Pakistan.  The discourse devoted to terror incidents endangering civilian population on both sides is critical and would demonstrate Pakistan’s renewed efforts to expunge terror within state.

Furthermore, adherence to planned sessions on important matter such as terrorism without Kashmir and various problems in Indo-Pak relationship could have conveyed strong message to the world and terror sponsors as well as operatives in particular on Pakistan’s seriousness to free the nation from terror control.

Beginning with 9/11 in the United States and multiple terror activities against India and other neighbors notwithstanding terror blasts across Pakistan wreaking havoc in the country, the NSA forum was prime opportunity to exchange relevant information and devise effective strategy to purge terror.

Pakistan’s rejection of the proposal to hold exclusive summit on terrorism could be misinterpreted amongst terror groups as state complicity to terror operations inside and across the border.

The series of Line of Control violations in the frontiers cannot be slighted promoting militancy and incursion aimed at escalating tensions between two nuclear nations.

Pakistan’s statement on armed forces ability to defend national sovereignty ignores reality.

Pakistan is under siege with diverse terror organizations making life impossible for citizens in national domain and conducting terror against India and Afghanistan with ISI support.

The nation’s first enemy is the one committing treason and betray citizenry.

Pakistan’s sovereignty violated on many occasions and prominent instance being United States Abbottabad mission supposedly to capture and kill the long deceased al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden near national defense headquarter.

NATO provocative air raid on Pakistan that resulted in several armed personnel tragic casualties while deployed as coalition forces in Pakistan with no apology from aggressors until today is a major setback for military, intelligence and political establishment.

As for Baluchistan secessionism, the evidence with Israel’s Mossad trained agents infiltration in disguise proficient in local language apparently not detected by Pakistan’s intelligence and military in predisposition towards India.

Pakistan internal circles on Saudi Arabia funding and United States military aid remain existential threat to nation and the region.

The debate on Kashmir for Pakistan and external sources instigating hostility using the subject as pretext evade responsibility on involvements in aiding and abetting terror at home and foreign land.

Kashmir separatists as proxies to members with vested interests at Kashmiris expense contributing to endless plight in subversion embarked as liberation crusade.

Kashmir is relevant to citizens in the valley more than anyone anywhere in the world.  The proselytized state comprises people of origin not necessarily subscribing to politically motivated foreign agenda. Accordingly, Kashmir merits comprehensive review and resolution to follow in due course.

Those nations prompting behind Kashmir topic need to introspect on prevalent situations against religious denominations of Islam viz. Bahai in Iran, incessant violence against Shia in Pakistan, the war in Yemen targeting Shias representing Houthi movement, the persecution of Kurds in Turkey, sectarianism in Iraq facilitating western and Middle East allies recruited terror and last but not the least the contentious Palestinian dispute.

Muslim nations worldwide are confronted with interior turmoil and fragility emanating from western influenced policy to deny political freedom in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Iraq as well as Iran to name a few in volatile Middle East.

Similarly, Islamic nations in South, South East and Central Asia besides Africa susceptible to political instability and unrest largely from incoherence and western dominance through military bases and occupation under the guise of security.

Pakistan’s democracy suppressed with military and intelligence agency intrusion in governance.  Since British partition of India in 1947, Pakistan struggles to retain democratic system with lingering opposition to civilian rule.

Then there are schisms proliferating turbulence with underworld crime syndicate and nefarious elements provided refuge with immunity from investigation and extradition.

The existing conditions in Pakistan is impetus on national priority to engage in constructive and meaningful interaction with India and surrounding neighbors in containing terror and insurgency claiming innocent lives all around.

Setting political differences and opinions aside, Pakistan and India resumption of talks at political, military and Border Security Forces levels pertinent to alleviate civilian suffering on either side.

The national pledge to safeguard citizens’ safety and territorial integrity is possible upon renouncing ties with those causing mayhem.

In the absence of delineation from terror manufacturers, the posturing on fighting terror is disingenuous and already consuming the premise fostering enmity.

Pakistan and India dealing with positive intentions to protect lives and eliminate skirmishes would guarantee sustainable peace.

The desirable economic growth and progress is attainable in peaceful and stable environment.  The governments dedication to diplomacy in reaching mutual consensus would determine the strength of democracy and independent status of a nation.

Pakistan and India are urged to move forward in forging better relations based on respect for life and trust in delivering secure future to the current and next generations.

Peace to all!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

extrapolate