COVID-19 – Manufacture and Engineering Science

June 23, 2021

COVID-19 – Manufacture and Engineering Science 

Padmini Arhant 

Who controls whom? 

Is Science controlling politics or vice versa?

The World Health Organization (WHO) and Center for disease control in the United States issue warning on the delta variant in the latest pandemic update. The delta variant identified in the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India in late April 2021 claimed to be deadlier than COVID-19 originating from Wuhan, China. 

In view of changing developments since the pandemic outbreak, it is important to reflect on guidance or the lack thereof from different authorities leading to status quo. 

The timeline presents huge credibility factor on the pandemic details and handling of the COVID-19 from the beginning until now. 

In January 2020, WHO in agreement with Beijing denied the virus transmission between humans and added there were absolutely no risks in international travel. This information was proved wrong with virus rapid impact and staggering mortalities prompting national and global lock down on March 22nd, 2020. 

The private entity in the United States –  the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines at the pandemic onset until today caused more confusion than clarity. 

The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) at the National Institute of Health (NIH) headed by the Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, the prominent advocate and funding specialist in Gain of Function research is facing own credibility issue with NIH funding the corona virus in Wuhan lab conducting experiments on SARS- Corona virus back in 2003 until 2018.

The CDC and NIAID led by Anthony Fauci entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working … 2015. Moderna signs a vaccine development agreement with NIAID and executes it with the lead on these according to The Fauci -COVID 19 Dossier’ presented below. 

The Reuters news on May 26, 2020Fauci says that Moderna’s vaccine candidate “would take about one year to 18 months if we were successful in … The Phase I will directly go into Phase II-III in late spring and early summer.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci’s trajectory predominantly favoring the controversial Gain of Function research with NIH funding on corona virus experiments in Wuhan lab, China span over a decade and longer.

The details of Dr. Anthony Fauci and University of North Carolina Professor Ralph Steven Baric involvement in Gain of Function research especially in infectious SARS corona virus is elaborated in ‘The Fauci – COVID-19 Dossier” created by Dr. David E. Martin referenced separately below this article for public knowledge, awareness and necessary actions.

University of North Carolina Professor Ralph Steven Baric collaboration with Dr. Shi Zhengli in Wuhan lab is corroborated in public data and extensively discussed in Dr. David E. Martin’s Dossier on Dr. Anthony Fauci and UNC Professor Ralph Steven Baric among several others not barring Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson…to name a few.

The abstract on Science and Engineering ethics in 2016 clarify Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. The GOFR is further stated to pose risks on bio safety and bio security. 

The advance notice from Wuhan lab Virologist Dr. Shi Zhengli back in 2015 on the possibility of global pandemic from a deadly contagious virus citing bats associated virus arouse valid questions on whether Dr. Shi Zhengli’s prediction was a premonition or a precaution based on the corona virus experiments long underway in Wuhan lab with United States NIH funding. The Gates Foundation by Bill and Melinda Gates investment to a tune of $200 -$250 million in Gain of Function experiments slighting serious repercussions highlight commercial vantage for investors with paradoxical reflection on philanthropy.

University of North Carolina Professor Ralph Steven Baric, Dr. Shi Zhengli and Gain of Function Research Investors Bill and Melinda Gates besides Dr. Anthony Fauci’s vigorous campaign and funding in Gain of Function Research – the corona viruses in Wuhan lab in particular emphasize the network connection among them. Additionally the simultaneous and synchronized alerts in 2015 from all these individuals echoing concern while engaged in the experiment process with funding and promoting GOFR in infectious SARS Corona virus rather than abandoning the experimental course is intriguing.

The coordination within members in elite scientific community, the communist party in China, the United States and Europe funded Wuhan lab in China and above all the massive cover up in the entire COVID 19 health, economic and humanitarian disaster surpass coincidence.

The earlier snippets sounding off alarm on the global pandemic in the near future that too in the year 2015 in a well organized manner might not have then attracted much attention or importance in the public domain. However, the global pandemic becoming a reality in late 2019 in Wuhan, China and soon spread across the globe in January 2020 is a world wide experience. Not to mention the fatalities in millions and still counting having become the norm and way of life.

The scientific wild adventure experimenting and engineering virus to test contagion effects in humans is evidently anything but altruistic in nature related to highly infectious SARS Corona Virus with little or no importance to ethical efficacy. The reckless indulgence against human conscience among those behind COVID 19 biological weapon ignoring horrendous costs on lives, livelihoods and freedom is too big to suppress as a freaking accident from the lab which again is criminal negligence in any context.

The humanity deserves justice with accountability holding none above law. As stated earlier, in COVID 19 – Investigation article on this website, any reluctance and political truancy, expediency or abstinence to prioritize this health, economic and humanitarian crises in holding all those responsible would be a violent treason against every nation and humanity at large.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

Author & Presenter 



The following information is for public knowledge and citizens actions in seeking accountability on COVID-19 inflicted human pain, suffering and irreversible losses in lives, livelihood and disintegration of human status. 


The document below and the information provided within is presented in accordance with the original source provider’s approval for public sharing to benefit humanity and humanitarian cause. Thank you.


THE FAUCI – COVID 19 Dossier

This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin. – Thank you.

This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CCBY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.


Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.

The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.

“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2

On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans

1. U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000


Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier CC-BY-NC-SA Dr. David E. Martin

Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.

In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.

We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws.

These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.

This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.














Got something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.