Syria – Conflict, Terror Evolution And UNSC Decision

November 21, 2015

By Padmini Arhant

Dear Citizens,

Syrian Conflict that began in March 2011 with western powers and allies in the Middle East sponsoring terrorism has claimed more than 250,000 innocent lives and forced millions of Syrians to leave their homeland as refugees facing worst humanitarian crises. 

The war then spread to Iraq and impact Lebanon, Turkey and now become a global  terror.  

 The western powers and coalition manufactured terror to destabilize Syria has evolved into Daesh Takfiri network.

I present impromptu thoughts on this topic.  The article is a synopsis with solutions to end Syrian warfare and terror existence.

Two remedies are offered in this context and they are – 

1. Western powers and allies withdrawal of support to terror operatives in Syria and Iraq.

2. The other requirement is complete and comprehensive ban on weapons supply to terror groups besides trade restriction with Daesh Takfiri and alike that would lead to terror networks disarmament.

Unwillingness and inaction in this regard would reveal the real enemies threatening humanity. 

Instead the latest UNSC decision to wage war against Daesh Takfiri elements surviving on western powers and partners financing, ammunitions delivery, illegal trading of Syrian and Libyan oil in addition to ammunitions sales from them is repeat strategy of Iraq invasion in 2003 under false pretext. 

Please click on the audio link for the full content.

Peace to all!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

Syria – Terror, Conflict and Humanitarian Crisis

November 15, 2015

By Padmini Arhant

Syrian Conflict that began in March 2011 –the premeditated western agenda with Middle Eastern alliance has claimed more than 250,000 innocent lives and millions mercilessly forced to leave their homeland to become refugees only to be declined by those responsible for the crises.

The warfare recruiting terror networks having wreaked havoc on Syrian population is now on the sources domain causing casualties and state of emergency.

The western strategy manufacturing, nurturing and deployment of terror outfits to destroy Syria that posed no threat to them or any neighbor in the region exemplify states sponsored terrorism.

As a result, the flawed western policies and deliberate destruction of lives and civilization in Syria, Iraq and Libya endanger peace and planet survival.

Having created mayhem through terror groups notwithstanding cannibalism, the strategists and so-called leaderships authorized bombing of Syria under the pretext of pursuing self-generated terrorists reflect serious deficit in moral consciousness and ethical efficacy. 

Not to mention the egregious decisions compromising regional and global security.

The western powers and coalition indulgence in Syria committing worst crimes against humanity clarify western political system is anything but democratic.

The fundamental problem is western powers and their allies’ direct involvement in funding, training and arming terrorists and relentless shelling in Syria.

Accordingly, consensus on arms embargo and sanctions against nations in breach of weapons ban to terror operatives would confirm international community sincere commitment to alleviate Syrian people suffering in the nearly five-year old senseless violence.

The current international conference in Vienna failure to address core issues and instead repeat demand for political transition and scheduling elections in a nation that recently held Presidential and national elections under independent and global supervision clearly violates Syria’s sovereignty besides treating Syrian electoral mandate in contempt.

Regardless of political, military and economic status – the foreign interference in sovereign nation’s internal political affairs aimed at destabilization is unconstitutional and illegitimate qualifying as impeachable action in a real democracy.

Ignoring public dissent to their governments contributing to political instability and perpetual chaos in foreign land highlights departure from republic control.

The global approach and honorable goal on Syria would be ending terror by terminating ammunitions and artillery delivery to terror recruits in Syria and respecting Syrians political rights and self-determination process.

Wishing Syrian citizens freedom from foreign invasion and success in combating terror.

Peace to Syria!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Syria – Turkey Aggression And No Fly Zone At United States Behest is Terrorism

July 27, 2015

By Padmini Arhant

Turkey under former Prime Minister changed to current President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and former Foreign Minister turned incumbent Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu transformed into western powers terror domain against Syria.

Interestingly the power swap was meant to extend Erdogan rule in Presidential post.  

However the election results altered Turkish political dynamics enabling PKK to enter Parliament with significant mandate and stifled AKP rise dashing political figures Erdogan and Davutoglu’s hope to contour Turkey political system. 

Man proposes and God disposes in unique format.

Since western powers authorized war on Syria in 2011, the western allies in the Middle East – Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar, Turkey, UAE and Jordan have assumed diverse roles in creating terror networks al Nusra Front, ISIL, ISIS from original al Qaeda deployed to destabilize Syria, Iraq and Lebanon followed by Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

The western powers having destroyed Libya through military air raids introducing no fly zone in 2011, the North African state now serving as weapons warehouse with free oil supply to the west via militia.

Turkey as NATO ally is under Germany occupation with Patriot missile installation in 2012 and a designated terror facilitator against Syria and Iraq.

Turkey transitioned from stable and secular democracy to chief terror operator essentially obeying the White House direct command.

Turkey leaderships Erdogan and Davutoglu are primarily responsible for Turkey’s fragile security and frail economy disregarding Turkish constitution that forbids aggression against non-threatening neighbors and nations anywhere. 

Turkish electorate disapproval of leaders Erdogan and Davutoglu’s aggressive stance and servility to western agenda cost AKP – the Justice and Development Party suffering a serious blow in the recent national election.

The AKP leader Davutoglu often slighted with western outreach to counterpart Erdogan on all affairs – enhancing terrorism in particular only to backfire at Turkey with terror attacks within state and lately near Syrian border.

Also leaders Erdogan and Davutoglu run administration reversed peaceful settlement with Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) into confrontational position favoring terror strategy.

Turkish leaders Erdogan and Davutoglu under United States purview continue to foster terrorism by training and arming ISIL and ISIS against Syria and Iraq.

The latest massacre resulting in Kurdish deaths with at least 30 killed and several critically injured in Turkish town Suruc along Syrian border was determined as ISIL attack arousing anger and retaliation from PKK highlighting Turkish formal training of terror operatives in the past five years maintained until now.

Accordingly PKK deemed Turkish authority accountable based on facts.

Turkey’s comprehensive terror promotion from the beginning of Syrian crisis and invigorated today with Washington’s authorization and coordination unravel falsehood in United States and allies disposition to combat terror.

Turkish leaderships Erdogan and Davutoglu terror operation maneuver is aimed at Kurds and Syrians in Syria.

Although claiming to contain ISIL and ISIS, the terror groups existence made possible with Turkish, Saudi, Qatar, Israel and Jordan’s support on United States and western coalition oversight.

The ongoing trend is for Turkey to launch air assault on Syria under the guise of joining the bandwagon to remove ISIL and ISIS even though reality confirms the activities strengthening ISIL and ISIS ability with Turkish authorities long provided assistance.

The alarming development that deserves international attention and rejection is United States pact with Turkey against Syria.

United States and Turkey latest agreement reached from talks between Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan and United States President Barack Obama allows U.S. to utilize Turkish Incirlik Air Base near Syria establishing Libyan style no fly zone in Syrian towns Marea and Jarabulus inside Syria.

The operation expected to have United States planes equipped with bombs and missiles accompanied by Turkish air raids denying Syria participation on their soil.

The plan warning that Syrian warplanes would be targeted upon entry into no fly zone in Syria ominously clarifies U.S and Turkey commitment to exacerbate Syrians terror experience.

U.S. and Turkey cooperation is not to dismantle ISIL and ISIS but designed to debilitate Syrian army achievement thus far.

In fact Turkey aerial attacks inside Syria in the past few days projecting Turkey pursuing ISIL and ISIS is misleading with no fly zone scenario in the offing.

United States and partners funded terror outfits in Syria are not in possession of warplanes and the idea behind no fly zone prohibiting Syrian fighter jets are to paralyze Syrian airspace.

Furthermore Ankara and Washington deal to train and arm anti-Syria Takfiris with the program having officially commenced in July 2015 seek to prepare 15,000 militants and more over three years to prolong terrorism.

United States presence in Turkey with 120 soldiers on the ground for this purpose under estimates human intelligence to accept setup as eliminating terror.

No foreign nation regardless of political stature and military capability could justify systematic destruction of sovereign state leaving over 250,000 dead and rendering millions as refugees in Syria.

United States led terror forces in Syria spreading into Iraq and Lebanon including Afghanistan with ISIL and ISIS arrival over there arguably leads to conclusion that terror sponsors remain the existential threat to humanity at large.

Terrorists did not emerge from nowhere. New World Order architects and protagonists representing United States and coalition using intelligence and military wings recruit economically deprived, gullible and vulnerable youths from different parts of the world to implement detrimental policy.

United States, Britain, France and allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel and Jordan are instrumental in terror manifestation.

Their insistence to stay on course evident in U.S. defense personnel training militants in Turkey at present to proliferate militancy against Syria and Iraq then moving across Middle East.

Turkey intervention in Syria at United States behest is serious violation of Syrian sovereignty.

The pending no fly zone barring Syrian planes on their turf proves absolute disrespect for Syrian territorial integrity and population plight with relentless violence unleashed on innocent children, women and men in that country.

United States and allies refraining from manufacturing, aiding and abetting terror networks is paramount for global peace and security alongside their credibility precipitating UNSC decline.

The scores of lives lost in Syria and citizens’ refugee status squarely falls on sponsors and catalysts of terrorism.

No real leader or head of the nation could possibly be proud of endless bloodshed and catastrophe brought upon a nation that never meant any harm towards them and the rest of the world.

Syria war must come to conclusion with no further procrastination to save mankind from irreversible calamity affecting all.

Everything has limit notwithstanding tolerance to incessant violence. The situation beyond control would prompt divine interception that could perhaps be prevented with immediate ceasefire and peaceful resolution.

Best Wishes to Syria and people in prevailing over terrorism and insidious western stratagem in the so-called war on terror.

Peace to Syria!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P5+1, EU Nuclear Deal – JCPOA Endanger Iran and Israel

July 21, 2015

By Padmini Arhant

Iran Nuclear Deal – the prolific nuclear powers P5+1 engagement with non-nuclear state Iran on non-nuclear proliferation is the irony to begin with and the purpose was to contain Iran from developing a nuclear bomb predominantly to protect the only nuclear state Israel in the Middle East.

The illegal sanctions on Iran were to be lifted in entirety in exchange for Iran’s commitment to limited nuclear activity.

As I mentioned earlier, Iran’s self-declaration on oil and natural gas reserves in possession lasting over hundred years essentially negate the need for nuclear energy.

Nonetheless, the uranium enrichment for nuclear medicine and scientific programs solely directed towards life saving projects do not require external approval due to notable difference in quantity otherwise involved in manufacturing nuclear weapon.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) Ali Akbar Salehi discussed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between P5+1 and Iran in Majlis i.e. Iranian Parliament.

Foreign Minister Zarif stated that Iran’s objectives were achieved in the deal and they are – establishing the nuclear program, enrichment and retaining the heavy water reactor.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Zarif also mentioned about termination of sanctions on nuclear program along with enhancement of Iran’s missile capabilities in addition to removing trade and financial embargo.

The Foreign Minister also emphasized that Iran has never been and is after nuclear weapons.

Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization Chief Ali Akbar Salehi briefing on JCPOA to Majlis clarified on the provisions of the agreement meant to restrict Iran from advancing towards nuclear bomb, however there are no constraints on the country’s nuclear sector since the Islamic Republic has never sought to build such weapons.

Objectively speaking, the Vienna agreement has allowed Iran nuclear program to remain intact creating false impression to Iran of P5+1 and EU having acceded to Iran’s nuclear rights.

Accordingly the foreign entities (P5+1 and EU) determined Iran as the nuclear power in the Vienna document that was adopted at UNSC with the contentious snap back mechanism reversing the JCPOA outcome using singular veto from the United States or any other ally assuming higher likelihood of Iran’s breach of contract as specified in the UNSC material.

Similarly the economic and financial sanctions are not necessarily removed despite such claim alongside stipulation in the UN resolution for sanctions to linger on for 10 years with five years extension upon initial term expiry.

The decision by P5+1 (P6) and EU obviously reached with the mindset of Iran violating the deal in the 10 years timeframe or in subsequent five years period.

Hence the statement on Iran as a nuclear power in the agreement prior to any acquisition now or in the immediate term.

Israeli authorities protest to P6 plus EU and Iran pact on the possibility of Iran transforming to nuclear power during economic boom from sanctions relief combined with P6 and EU relaxation on Iran’s nuclear sector ignore the snap back option in the agreement.

There are two scenarios from the opposite sides drawing attention.

Israel assertion on Iran bound for nuclear status regardless of snap back clause in UNSC resolution.

Perhaps Israel’s concerns are Iran’s preparedness towards Israel’s established pre-emptive strikes and provocation currently witnessed in Pentagon’s wanton rhetoric of military action against the Islamic state.

Iran stance on non-nuclear aspiration in the past and present that could not be affirmed for the future with the guarantors of today not being around tomorrow.

Contemporary issues are being addressed on short term basis neglecting repercussions in the long run.

When arriving at consensus on matter of greater importance affecting lives, the assessment of negative impact with appropriate remedy should be part of the solution.

JCPOA fails to accommodate Iran’s response to any fabricated account to derail the process. The option to revive sanctions with veto could trigger Iran reverting to nuclear goals.

With unpredictable future preventing destructive course would be wise rather than enticing Iran into entrapment prevalent in the pact.

The genuine peace accord would comprehensively and unconditionally eliminate sanctions against Iran on economic, banking and financial sector given the illegitimate rule exercised by UNSC exclusive club with veto power.

Israel’s anxiety could be alleviated upon Israel’s compliance on nuclear non-proliferation treaty becoming a signatory and exceeding expectation with nuclear disarmament i.e. dismantling Israel’s Negev Research Center, Dimona site would aptly qualify the self-proclaimed Jewish state to campaign on anti-nuclear enhancement.

In return Iran abandoning nuclear programs and shutting down sites would be fair and equal without any known or unknown JCPOA incidents prompting such actions.

Israel and Iran’s mutual and simultaneous nuclear disinheritance would guarantee peace and stability in the region.

United States administration belief that JCPOA would prohibit war in the Middle East with persisting conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and Libya is misleading in context and reality.

Israel and Iran convergence on nuclear strategy divergence is the best viable option.

Peace to all!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iran – UN Resolution on Sanctions And Stipulation

July 15, 2015

From: Padmini Arhant

UN resolution on sanctions and stipulations in the Iran nuclear agreement with P5+1 will be discussed in due course.

Meanwhile, the topic per the news report presented for reference.

————————————————————————————————

UN Resolution Would End Iran Sanctions in 10 Years

By Associated Press – Published on July 16, 2015. – Thank you.

A draft U.N. resolution to implement the Iran nuclear deal says U.N. sanctions would “snap back” into place if Iran fails to meet its obligations. But it also says that stipulation would end in 10 years.

The draft, obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, states that none of the seven previous U.N. resolutions on Iran sanctions “shall be applied” after 10 years, and “the Security Council will have concluded its consideration of the Iranian nuclear issue.”

But a U.S. official familiar with the details of the resolution said the five veto-wielding permanent members of the council agreed that a new resolution would be adopted at the end of 10 years to reinstate the snap back mechanism for an additional five years.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said the agreement by ministers from the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany who negotiated the deal “will be in writing as a statement of intention.”

President Barack Obama has cited the snap-back mechanism as a main defense of the proposed pact in responding to sharp criticism from the U.S. Congress and some American allies. France also has stressed the significance of sanctions coming back into force quickly if Iran breaks it promises.

But Russian officials have given mixed accounts of how the mechanism would work. Moscow has traditionally opposed any voting procedures in which it would lose its Security Council veto power though Obama said Wednesday that “in the agreement, we’ve set it up so we can override Iran’s objection, and we don’t need Russia or China in order for us to get that override.”

“If they continue to object,” Obama said, “we’re in a position to snap back sanctions and declare that Iran’s in violation and is cheating.”

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power circulated the draft resolution to the Security Council on Wednesday and diplomats said they expect a vote probably early next week.

—————————————————————————————————–

 

Israel – Interview with Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu

January 9, 2015

PIT – Interview with Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu

Padmini Arhant

PIT – Interview with Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu

Dear Citizens,

This is Padmini Arhant.  Author, Presenter and Performer on padminiarhant.com.

Welcome to interaction with powerful entities representing the ruling class in the PIT.

The PIT (Parody on Identity Theft) is aimed at unveiling hidden facts, dispel myths and discuss issues relevant to humanity.

Hegemony goals deny freedom, economic opportunity and social justice to the vast majority worldwide.

Hegemony agenda is to condition victims in accepting imposed status quo as destiny.   

I think otherwise considering the natural law for all creations to be free and treated with kindness, love, respect and dignity.

Politics is instrumental in implementing laws that address problems in the country and the world at large.

Ironically political leaderships representing hegemony are involved in exacerbating rather than alleviating human suffering at home and abroad.

The political figure I am about to introduce is known for defiance and opposition to peaceful resolutions on conflicts especially the decades old Mid East peace process. Palestinian Statehood.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I present the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Prime Minister of Israel and leader of the Likud Party – Benjamin Netanyahu welcome to the public domain – padminiarhant.com.

Thank you.

Let me begin with your political status.

Ques. 1. Controversy, cavalier approach and cart blanche authority is the hall mark of your political career. How do you justify the legacy amid your designation as the head of a democratic state?

Ans. I favor extra judicial power at the executive branch and accordingly exercise authority beyond constitutional and democratic norms with little or no regard for national and international concern.

Ques. 2. Does this mean assuming Israel a democracy is misconception with the political system premised on extremism granting excess power to representatives in office besides discrimination against women, minority and immigrants from Africa in particular?

Ans. Israel is governed by ideology. The coalition with political factions espousing radicalism adds another dimension to representation. Israel being hegemony along with other partners considers democracy inconvenient in many respects.

Ques. 3. You attracted sharp criticism from your party member recently for having minimal women members comparing the ratio in Israeli Knesset worse than Saudi Parliament consisting at least 20% in the latest configuration.

When Israel extends conscription on women to serve in the military, why is there gender gap in civil service?

Ans. Again the choices are in accordance with political doctrine and fundamental cause that does not subscribe to democratic setting.

Ques. 4. How would you define freedom?

Ans. In my view freedom is a privilege and only the selective few belonging to specific creed and class deserve to be free. Although I cherish my freedom and always perform at will even if that is in violation of others rights or law that exists anywhere, conforming to hegemony value I am vehemently opposed to the idea of liberty and justice for all.

Let us focus on Middle East affairs.

Palestinian statehood.

This would bring Israeli occupation and oppression of Palestinian children, women and men to an end.

The settlement activity in West Bank and East Jerusalem slighting global condemnation would be reversed allowing the natives i.e. the Palestinians inhabitation.

The siege on Gaza with unilateral economic blockade and closing Rafa crossing at Egypt border accompanied by routine air strikes claiming thousands of innocent lives could no longer continue contributing to revival of Gaza’s economy and life restoration.

The military raid in al Aqsa mosque, al Quds conducted at regular intervals as Israel’s prerogative would cease.

Palestine would have farmers growing crops and olive trees and enable livelihood to fishermen in Gaza. Palestinian youths would be gainfully employed from trade and economic activities instead of spending their prime time in Israeli prison without legal recourse.

On the Israeli side, the citizens in Southern Israel need not be evacuated for Gaza’s retaliation to Israel’s shelling – the ongoing trend that targets densely populated Gaza not barring the use of white phosphorus and uranium.

Palestinians normal existence would be Israel earning respect and credibility as a peaceful state.

Despite the positive outcome benefitting citizens in Palestine and Israel,

Ques. 5. Do you and those against Palestinian Statehood really believe that such conviction is in Israel’s best interest?

Ans. Our convictions are based on presumptuous notions and deception to prolong occupation as hegemony for regional and global dominance. The state and citizens do not matter. We use religion as pawn to promote our convoluted belief and actions alongside disdain for spiritualism, nature and God.

Ques. 6. Israel’s adventure in the region sharing the allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, Turkey and alike aspirations for destabilization through terrorism and relentless warfare evident in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon confirm the pattern as a belligerent state.

Where does this lead Israel with the Middle East remaining volatile due to hegemonic role?

Ans. The volatility infuses tensions and the situation facilitates Israel’s demand on United States tax payers to provide blank check in the form of military and economic aid. Israel’s monetary gains at United States tax payers’ losses is the zero sum game.

Ques. 7. Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan heights, Palestine’s Jordan Valley in addition to occupied territory, control over Egypt’s Sinai peninsula and incursion in Lebanon through reconnaissance flights arguably undermines national sovereignty of respective states in the Middle East.

The illegal claim asserted under the pretext of the Promised Land by God.

Do you and others behind this invented theory expect the world to honor the neo conservative and orthodox convention as Gospel truth implying God’s will against logic and legitimacy?

Ans. Hegemony ambitions encompass expansionism by any means including fabrication and falsification with reference to God for validity.

Contradictions vs. Reality

A. Israel is a nuclear state with nuclear site in Dimona. U.S. tax payer funding is regularly expended to defend nuclear armed Israel under the guise of security.

B. Israel declared the only democratic state yet the authorities do not spare any moment to stifle democracy across the region.

C. Judaism and Islam as Abrahamic religions having emerged from the same source with many commonalities are at odds on territorial dispute. Nonetheless the architects and protagonists isolate Islam from the roots and associate with identity not even remotely related in characteristics whether similar or peculiar.

D. Israel is being classified as a Jewish state. At the same time there is objection to Palestinian refugees return to Palestine.

E. God is mentioned to authenticate concepts paradoxical to divine purpose.

Ques. 8. How do you explain Israel’s above outlined contradictory positions compared with reality?

Ans. The brief response to all of the above positions is Israel’s divergence reserved as the exclusive right in the quest for supremacy.

Ques. 9. Your reaction to 9/11 terror against United States in 2001 was – Very Good for Israel.

Is there any remorse for Israel’s involvement against the benefactor United States in events like the attack on USS Liberty that led to 34 servicemen instant deaths, September 11 terrorism and continuous espionage via selective congressional members and political aide pledged allegiance to hegemony compromising United States security and independence?

Ans. We seek apology from the victims and apologize to none. Hegemony strategy is violation of trust, treason and corruption.

Ques. 10. Finally. Do you concur with the chosen ones proclamation?

Yes. Not by God. However, by the secret society.

Prime Minister of Israel and Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahoo – Thank you for your confession.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Syria – United States Air Strikes using ISIL as Pretext

September 30, 2014

By Padmini Arhant

United States airstrikes in Syria using ISIL as pretext has produced many civilian casualties so far with majority of them are children.

The airstrikes has also been targeting Syrian oil fields as opposed to ISIL group and the assault also focused on Syrian defense force operation.

United States air strikes without UNSC resolution and most importantly not having sought United States citizens’ approval set dangerous precedence in the misuse of executive power aimed at illegal invasion of foreign nation. 

The United States leadership having declined Syrian government cooperation and defense force coordination in the so-called war on terror against ISIL essentially created a NO FLY ZONE in Syria. 

Syrian authorities are sidelined in their own nation with United States intervention exacerbating situation rather than diffusing crises in the war torn nation.

United States military action is not directed at containing terrorism considering ISIL is al-Qaeda offshoot and provided training, logistic support and financing by United States and allies as sponsors in the Syrian conflict.

Syrian war has resulted in more than 200,000 deaths and 2 million refugees not to mention the contagion effect in Iraq and Lebanon with death toll and humanitarian problems at peak.

The alternative to airstrikes – defunding and ceasing weapons supply to ISIL and other terror networks rejected to inflict severe damages and loss of innocent lives in the beleaguered country.

United States as chief purveyor of terror along with coalition is seeking destabilization of Syria ignoring pervasive destruction. 

The catastrophic activity would adversely impact neighbors and co-sponsors such as Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Jordan and Turkey.

The terror networks are deployed and equipped with ammunitions to prolong warfare in Syria and Iraq. 

The end game is to remove the democratically elected government and install proxy rule like in Iraq, Ukraine and elsewhere.

Hegemony promoting violence and relentless killings via terrorism is self-destructive and expedite imminent collapse conforming to consequences in pursuing failed strategy.

The genocide in Syria and Iraq at hegemony behest is a war crime and in any civilized and just world would be impeachable for abuse of power.

Again with hegemony granted political immunity, the position in public office allowed to commit atrocities and foster unrest within state and worldwide.

The license to kill at will is the trend where democracy in disguise notwithstanding deception and falsehood at the apex misleading the nation towards undesirable direction.

The political system in the absence of checks and balances evades responsibility and undermines electorate discretion transforming representative designation into domination.

Submission to hegemony goals premised on polarization and instigating turbulence reveals leaderships’ loyalty to external forces discarding ramifications in domestic and global context.

The betrayal of trust having become political hallmark precipitates expiry proving flawed and illegitimate means invariably deliver source dissolution.

Syria and Iraq following Libya is an intentional sabotage with hegemony slight for peaceful resolutions reflected in the unsuccessful Geneva accord in 2013 and 2014 leading to status quo.

The population in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon are targeted through terror outfits generating scenario for air raids in the backdrop of seizing control over oil rich territories – the real motive behind hegemony interference.

I wish the citizens in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Middle East independence and long lasting peace subsequent to hegemony termination.

Peace to all! 

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Syria – United States Air Strikes using ISIL as Pretext

 

United States airstrikes in Syria using ISIL as pretext has produced many civilian casualties so far with majority of them are children.

 

The airstrikes has also been targeting Syrian oil fields as opposed to ISIL group and the assault also focused on Syrian defense force operation.

 

United States air strikes without UNSC resolution and most importantly not having sought United States citizens’ approval set dangerous precedence in the misuse of executive power aimed at illegal invasion of foreign nation.

 

The United States leadership having declined Syrian government cooperation and defense force coordination in the so-called war on terror against ISIL essentially created a NO FLY ZONE in Syria.

 

Syrian authorities are sidelined in their own nation with United States intervention exacerbating situation rather than diffusing crises in the war torn nation.

 

United States military action is not directed at containing terrorism considering ISIL is al-Qaeda offshoot and provided training, logistic support and financing by United States and allies as sponsors in the Syrian conflict.

 

Syrian war has resulted in more than 200,000 deaths and 2 million refugees not to mention the contagion effect in Iraq and Lebanon.

 

The alternative to airstrikes – defunding and ceasing weapons supply to ISIL and other terror networks rejected to inflict severe damages and loss of innocent lives in the beleaguered country.

 

United States as chief purveyor of terror along with coalition is seeking destabilization of Syria ignoring pervasive destruction.

 

The catastrophic activity would adversely impact neighbors and co-sponsors such as Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan and Turkey.

 

The terror networks are deployed and equipped with ammunitions to prolong warfare in Syria and Iraq.

 

The end game is to remove the democratically elected government and install proxy rule like in Iraq, Ukraine and elsewhere.

 

Hegemony promoting violence and relentless killings via terrorism is self-destructive and expedite imminent collapse conforming to consequences in pursuing failed strategy.

 

The genocide in Syria and Iraq at hegemony behest is a war crime and in any civilized and just world would be impeachable for abuse of power.

 

Again with hegemony granted political immunity, the position in public office allowed to commit atrocities and foster unrest within state and worldwide.

 

The license to kill at will is the trend in democracy in disguise notwithstanding deception and falsehood at the apex misleading the nation towards undesirable direction.

 

The political system in the absence of checks and balances evades responsibility and undermines electorate discretion transforming representative designation into domination.

 

Submission to hegemony goals premised on polarization and instigating turbulence reveals leaderships’ loyalty to external forces discarding ramifications in domestic and global context.

 

The betrayal of trust having become political hallmark precipitates expiry proving flawed and illegitimate means invariably deliver source dissolution.

 

Syria and Iraq following Libya is an intentional sabotage with hegemony slight for peaceful resolutions reflected in the unsuccessful Geneva accord in 2013 and 2014 leading to status quo.

 

The population in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon are targeted through terror outfits generating scenario for air raids in the backdrop of seizing control over oil rich territories – the real motive behind hegemony interference.

 

I wish the citizens in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Middle East independence and long lasting peace subsequent to hegemony termination.

 

Peace to all!

 

Thank you.

 

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Palestine – Israel Aggression Against Gaza

July 23, 2014

From:  Padmini Arhant

Dear Citizens of the World,

You are welcome to tune in to audio version on the topic – Israel aggression against Gaza.

Please click on the audio link above for details.

Thank you your interest and attention.

Padmini Arhant

—————————————————————————————————————

By Padmini Arhant

Palestine – Israel Aggression Against Gaza

Israeli authorities ongoing aggression having claimed at least 600 and more lives and still counting is deeply regrettable and deserves denouncement.

Israel pursuing violence to exert authority over Palestinians in the occupied territory has no limits and the oppression since the establishment of Israel in 1948 continues until now.

Whenever Israel is at odds with political development in Palestine, Israel’s leadership immediate response from is military attacks and intensified ground raids not even sparing the place of worship – al Aqsa mosque in al Quds, East Jerusalem.

Similarly Israel’s unilateral blockade on Gaza from 2007 has crippled Gaza’s economy with life made impossible for the citizens in the beleaguered enclave.

The sanctions are not confined to trade activities alone but also extended towards livelihoods with restrictions on fishermen in coastal Gaza.

Gaza fishermen inadvertent crossing beyond demarcated territorial waters dealt with extreme measures ranging from apprehension, prolonged detention to random shooting in the speedboat chase threatening the fishing community in Gaza.

Israel’s routine airstrikes followed by persistent ground incursion is reprehensible.

Again the belligerence with impunity on international watch and Arab league silence imply complicity and endorsement of crimes against defenseless and voiceless people in Gaza and the rest of Palestine.

Israel and allies justifying military option and tactics as self-defense is baseless and confirms utter disregard for Palestinian lives and human rights in the occupied state.

In the absence of collective responsibility to condemn Israeli authorities provocation and use of force the innocent civilians pay the price,

Israeli government issuing construction permits extending settlement activities in West Bank, al-Quds and now the military assault on Gaza clarifies the political paradox in the proclamation of Israel being the only democracy in the Middle East.

The fact of the matter is the architects behind the policy against Palestinians promote subjugation through occupation and suppression of political freedom for regional dominance and influence via proxy representation in most parts of the world under the guise of democracy.

Israeli government with allies – United States and Britain defending the indefensible offense in Gaza speaks volume on the kind of democracy prevalent in respective domains and arguably raise questions on the legitimacy of the power enforcing gross human rights violation.

Ever since the formation of unity government in Ramallah emerging from bilateral consensus between Hamas and Fatah leaderships,

Israel along with United States having vehemently opposed the unification is currently engaged in turning Gaza into the playground to test defense stockpiles and innovative technology in Israel’s possession.

Showing no remorse for the killings of children, women and youths in Gaza, the leaderships in Israel, United States, Britain and alike in favor of present violence demonstrates political characteristics in contradiction to assertion as democracy worthy of emulation.

Unwillingness to accept political progress in Palestine is the sign of insecurity and frustration over declining supremacy.

The nuclear state Israel’s defiance to international call to cease Palestinian oppression only isolates the former and,

Global perspective on this issue evidently identifies the occupier as the problem.

Israeli authorities persecution of Palestinians – Gaza in particular targeted at every opportunity is self-detrimental and indicative of the beginning of the end of sponsors with unmitigated disaster arising from reckless policy.

United States veto at the U.N. Security Council on Palestinian issue is predominantly responsible for status quo.

Had United States adopted fairness and objectivity reflecting democratic values and respect for all lives rather than selective protection on humanitarian and political affairs during UNSC resolutions,

The Palestinian and global crises could be contained and resolved in humanity’s interest.

Instead the failed strategy is the preference, expecting to prevail in the misguided agenda.

Israel and allies credibility is directly linked with recognition of Palestinians as members of human race and acknowledgment of Palestinian rights to exist in a free society.

United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) coming forward with every member state exercising sovereign right on unanimous approval to the establishment of Independent Palestine is the urgent requirement on Israeli Palestinian dispute settlement. 

The formal and official status to Palestinian statehood encompassing contentious and relevant matter is the key solution to Palestinian political struggle.

Israel renouncing violence for peaceful co-existence would guarantee stability and security to all in the otherwise volatile region.

Those instigating unrest and turmoil anywhere could not be democratic and the lack of tolerance to unity endangers global peace with inevitable adverse impact for the origin.

Israel’s ceasefire against Gaza and honoring Palestinian liberty with unconditional release of all detainees in detention centers, freezing settlers expansion in West Bank and demolition of Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem, withdrawal of Israeli forces from the occupied territory is paramount for positive outcome in the peace initiative on Israeli and Palestinian conflict.

Israel’s military might exacerbates Palestinian plight notwithstanding the egregious decisions affecting the source having exhausted the victims and global citizens patience on abuse of power and privilege.

Finally, Israeli authorities concern for own safety amid violent pursuits against residents in Gaza and remaining Palestine is entirely dependent on renunciation of obsolete dogma in appreciation for Palestinian and others freedom.

I offer my sincere condolences to bereaved families with prayers for those wounded in the unnecessary and unwanted warfare in Gaza.

May God bless the people seeking relief from suffering and expedite the new beginning marking the conclusion of terror causing turbulence.

Peace to all!

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

 

 

 

Iraq – Takfiri Militancy and Escalation of Violence

June 29, 2014

By Padmini Arhant

Dear Citizens,

The presentation on Iraq – Takfiri Militancy and Escalation of Violence is available via audio link and you are welcome to  tune in for details.

Please click on the above audio link for substance.

Thank you for your interest.

Padmini Arhant

Presentation – ISIL in Iraq

June 18, 2014

From:  Padmini Arhant

Dear Citizens,

You are welcome to tune in to the presentation on ISIl in Iraq.  

Please click on the audio link above for details.

Thank you for your interest.

Padmini Arhant

 

« Previous PageNext Page »

PadminiArhant.com